25 U.S.C. § 2009

Division of Budget Analysis

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Establishment

Not later than 1 year after January 8, 2002, the Secretary shall establish within the Office of Indian Education Programs a Division of Budget Analysis (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Division”). Such Division shall be under the direct supervision and control of the Director of the Office.

(b) Functions

In consultation with the tribal governing bodies and tribal school boards, the Director of the Office, through the Division, shall conduct studies, surveys, or other activities to gather demographic information on Bureau-funded schools and project the amount necessary to provide Indian students in such schools the educational program set forth in this chapter.

(c) Annual reportsNot later than the date on which the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs makes the annual budget submission, for each fiscal year after January 8, 2002, the Director of the Office shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress (including the Appropriations committees), all Bureau-funded schools, and the tribal governing bodies of such schools, a report that contains—(1) projections, based upon the information gathered pursuant to subsection (b) and any other relevant information, of amounts necessary to provide Indian students in Bureau-funded schools the educational program set forth in this chapter;(2) a description of the methods and formulas used to calculate the amounts projected pursuant to paragraph (1); and(3) such other information as the Director of the Office considers appropriate.(d) Use of reports

The Director of the Office and the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs shall use the annual report required by subsection (c) when preparing annual budget submissions.

(Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, § 1129, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title X, § 1042, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2038.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 2009, Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, § 1129, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title III, § 381, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3998, related to Division of Budget Analysis, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

Another prior section 2009, Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, § 1129, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2321; Pub. L. 98–511, title V, §§ 506, 507(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2395, 2396; Pub. L. 99–89, § 6, Aug. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 382; Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, § 4133(b)(4), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–134; Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §§ 5109, 5110, 5118, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 375, 376, 382; Pub. L. 100–427, §§ 6, 9(d), Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1605, 1607, related to uniform direct funding and support, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 103–382.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as a note under section 6301 of Title 20, Education.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Hamilton v. Lanning

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hamilton v. Lanning (2010) scotus · cites it 4× “) (“projected natural gas supply and demand”); 25 U. S. C. §2009 (c)(1), (2) (requiring the Director of the Office of Indian Education Programs to submit an annual report containing certain projections and “a description of the methods and formulas used to calculate the amounts…”

Hamilton v. Lanning (2010) scotus · cites it 2× “) (“projected natural gas supply and demand”); 25 U. S. C. §2009 (c)(1), (2) (requiring the Director of the Office of Indian Education Programs to submit an annual report containing certain projections and “a description of the methods and formulas used to calculate the amounts…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.