Notes of Decisions
Koi Nation of N. Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 361 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
· cites it 5× “See 25 U.S.C. § 5130 notes (Congressional Findings ¶ 3) (providing that "Indian tribes presently may be recognized by Act of Congress; by the administrative procedures set forth in part 83 of the Code of Federal Regulations denominated 'Procedures for Establishing that an…”
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021).
· cites it 2× “See 25 U. S. C. §§5130 , 5131. The List Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to pub- lish an annual list of “all Indian tribes which the Secretary recognizes to be eligible for the special programs and ser- vices provided by the United States to Indians because of their…”
Cnty. of Amador v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 872 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2017).
“4791 (1994), codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 5130 , 5131. The “findings” section of the law—which was not codified in the United States Code— includes the following statement: “Indian tribes presently may be recognized by Act of Congress; by the administrative procedures set forth in…”
Mdewakanton Sioux Indians of Minnesota v. Jewell, 264 F. Supp. 3d 116 (D.D.C. 2017).
“Plaintiffs do not dispute that the MSIM is not “recognized” by the Secretary of the Interior or included on the list of Indian tribes published by the Secretary pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 5130 (2) et seq. See, e.g., Compl.”
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. Zinke, 304 F. Supp. 3d 70 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“, the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act, 25 U.S.C § 5130 et seq. , in connection with two events: the agency's failure to issue a decision on a petition…”
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Mnuchin, 456 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D.D.C. 2020).
· cites it 2× “” 25 U.S.C. § 5130 (2). That clearly defined exclusion of ANCs begs the question: If Congress wanted to exclude ANCs from receiving CARES Act funds, why not incorporate the definition of “Indian tribe” from the List Act, or refer expressly to the published list itself? As amicus…”
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, No. 20-543 (U.S. July 28, 2021).
· cites it 2× “See 25 U. S. C. §§5130 , 5131. The List Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to pub- lish an annual list of “all Indian tribes which the Secretary recognizes to be eligible for the special programs and ser- vices provided by the United States to Indians because of their…”
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. Zinke, No. 2017-0038 (D.D.C. Mar. 29, 2018).
“, the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act, 25 U.S.C § 5130 et seq., 1 Plaintiff originally named former Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs…”
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Mnuchin, No. 2020-1002 (D.D.C. June 26, 2020).
“, 25 U.S.C. § 5130 (2) (“The term ‘Indian Tribe’ means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian Tribe.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.