25 U.S.C. § 564e
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1971–2012 · leading case: Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 203 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 203 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “1954 Act § 6(b) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 564e(b)); see also Klamath & Modoc Tribes, 436 F.”
Klamath & Modoc Tribes & Yahooskin Band of Indians v. The United States. Elva G. Anderson v. The United States, 436 F.2d 1008 (Ct. Cl. 1971). “718 (1954), as amended, 25 U.S.C. § 564e (1964). Upon publication, however, only a limited property interest was created.”
Charles E. Kimball v. John D. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1974). “”25 U.S.C. § 564e(c). On the final tribal roll were 2,133 persons.”
United States v. Felter, 546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah 1982). “25 U.S.C. § 564e(c). Only the express exception for fishing and other treaty rights, 25 *1023 U.”
Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 87 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “1954 Act § 6(b) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 564e(b)); see also Klamath & Modoc Tribes, 436 F.”
United States v. Perry Von Murdock, 132 F.3d 534 (10th Cir. 1997). “The KTA provided that “[m]embers of the tribe who receive the money value of their interests in tribal property shall thereupon cease to be members of the tribe,” 25 U.S.C. § 564e(c), and further provided that “[n]othing in this subchapter shall abrogate any fishing rights or…”
United States v. Murdock (10th Cir. 1997). “The KTA provided that “[m]embers of the tribe who receive the money value of their interests in tribal property shall thereupon cease to be members of the tribe,” 25 U.S.C. § 564e(c), and further provided that “[n]othing in this subchapter shall abrogate any fishing rights or…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 564e(a) — 1 case
Klamath & Modoc Tribes & Yahooskin Band of Indians v. The United States. Elva G. Anderson v. The United States, 436 F.2d 1008 (Ct. Cl. 1971). “718 (1954), as amended, 25 U.S.C. § 564e (1964). Upon publication, however, only a limited property interest was created.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 564e(b) — 3 cases
Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 203 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “1954 Act § 6(b) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 564e(b)); see also Klamath & Modoc Tribes, 436 F.”
Klamath & Modoc Tribes & Yahooskin Band of Indians v. The United States. Elva G. Anderson v. The United States, 436 F.2d 1008 (Ct. Cl. 1971). “718 (1954), as amended, 25 U.S.C. § 564e (1964). Upon publication, however, only a limited property interest was created.”
Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 87 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “1954 Act § 6(b) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 564e(b)); see also Klamath & Modoc Tribes, 436 F.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 564e(c) — 4 cases
Charles E. Kimball v. John D. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1974). “”25 U.S.C. § 564e(c). On the final tribal roll were 2,133 persons.”
United States v. Felter, 546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah 1982). “25 U.S.C. § 564e(c). Only the express exception for fishing and other treaty rights, 25 *1023 U.”
United States v. Perry Von Murdock, 132 F.3d 534 (10th Cir. 1997). “The KTA provided that “[m]embers of the tribe who receive the money value of their interests in tribal property shall thereupon cease to be members of the tribe,” 25 U.S.C. § 564e(c), and further provided that “[n]othing in this subchapter shall abrogate any fishing rights or…”
United States v. Murdock (10th Cir. 1997). “The KTA provided that “[m]embers of the tribe who receive the money value of their interests in tribal property shall thereupon cease to be members of the tribe,” 25 U.S.C. § 564e(c), and further provided that “[n]othing in this subchapter shall abrogate any fishing rights or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.