U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXVIII— UTE INDIANS OF UTAH: DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS BETWEEN MIXED-BLOOD AND FULL-BLOOD MEMBERS; TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION OVER PROPERTY OF MIXED-BLOOD MEMBERS

25 U.S.C. § 677g

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972). · cites it 2× “Section 8 of the Act, 25 U. S. C. § 677g, called for the preparation of the rolls of full-blood members and mixed-blood members, and for the finality of those rolls.”
Ute Distrib. Corp. v. Sec'y of the Interior of the United States, 584 F.3d 1275 (10th Cir. 2009). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677g. Those membership rolls were finalized and published on April 5, 1956.”
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 349 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677g (1988). Plaintiffs did not challenge their omission from either roll within the sixty days, and similar to Tabbee , are now time-barred by the statute of limitations from challenging the listing provision of the Ute Termination Act.”
Chapoose v. Clark, 607 F. Supp. 1027 (D. Utah 1985). “25 U.S.C. § 677g (emphasized portion added in 1956 amendment).”
Tabbee v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “25 U.S.C. § 677g. The Secretary’s final rolls were published in the Federal Register in April, 1956, listing 490 mixed-bloods and 1314 full-bloods.”
Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994). “In 1956, the Secretary published, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 677g, final rolls that listed 1,314 full-blood members and 490 mixed-blood members.”
United States v. Perry Von Murdock, 132 F.3d 534 (10th Cir. 1997). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677g. Mr. Murdock was not yet born when the Act took effect, he has never been a Tribal member with interests which would trigger the right to notice, and he therefore has no standing to challenge the adequacy of the notice provision.”
Ute Distrib. Corp. v. Sec'y of the Interior of the United States, 934 F. Supp. 1302 (D. Utah 1996). “In 1956, the Secretary of the Interior published, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 677g, final rolls listing 1,314 full-blood members of the Ute Tribe (72.”
Maldonado v. Hodel, 683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah 1988). “[25 U.S.C. § 677g] will be issued ten shares of stock in said corporation.”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of the Interior (D. Utah 2024). · cites it 3× “34 Pursuant to Section 23 of the UPA, after all terminated members received 29 25 U.S.C. § 677g. 30 Id. 31 Id.; see also 25 U.”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of the Interior (D. Utah 2025). · cites it 2× “23 25 U.S.C. § 677g. 24 Id. 25 Id.; see also id.”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of Interior (10th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2× “Congress also directed the Secretary, “upon fulfilling certain other requirements, . . . ‘[to] publish in the Federal Register a proclamation declaring that the Federal Trust relationship to such individual is terminated.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.