U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXXVII–A— WYANDOTTE, PEORIA, OTTAWA, AND MODOC TRIBES OF OKLAHOMA: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION

25 U.S.C. § 861

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1982–2024 · leading case: Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1250 (10th Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1250 (10th Cir. 2001). “95-281, 92 Stat 246 (1978) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 861 ). In 1984, Congress enacted legislation providing for the appropriation and distribution of money in satisfaction of judgments awarded to the Wyandottes by the Indian Claims Commission and the Court of Claims.”
Wyandotte Nation v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'n, 437 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Kan. 2006). “246 (1978) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 861 ). 150 . Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.”
United States v. Felter, 546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah 1982). “246, now codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 861 et seq. (supp. 1981) (restoration of four terminated Oklahoma tribes); Act of Dec.”
State v. Brester, 531 P.3d 125 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “246, 25 U.S.C. § 861 (1978) [hereinafter "Reinstatement Act"].”
United States v. Archambault, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1010 (D.S.D. 2002). “§§ 903 -903Í); see also, 25 U.S.C. § 861 (b), (c) (repealing termination of federal supervision over certain Indian tribes in Oklahoma and "reinstalling] all rights and privileges of each of the tribes .”
State v. Brester, 2023 OK CR 10 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “246, 25 U.S.C. § 861 (1978) [hereinafter "Reinstatement Act"].”
State v. Brester, 2023 OK CR 10 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “246, 25 U.S.C. § 861 (1978) [hereinafter "Reinstatement Act"].”
State v. Fuller, 2024 OK CR 4 (Okla. Crim. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “246 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 861 (May 15, 1978)) (hereinafter "Reinstatement Act").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.