Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 1956–2026 · leading case:
Billing v. Com. One, Inc., 186 F. Supp. 2d 375 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
Billing v. Com. One, Inc., 186 F. Supp. 2d 375 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
“See - 28 U.S.C. § 100 . Many of the acts and omissions occurred within Maryland and therefore fall within the judicial district of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.”
Brannen v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger, Corp., 403 F. Supp. 2d 89 (D.D.C. 2005).
“28 U.S.C. § 100 . Accordingly, a subpoena issued by the Untied States District Court for the District of Maryland has power over all witness in Maryland, regardless of whether they are within 100 miles from the courthouse.”
Star v. Preller, 352 F. Supp. 530 (D. Md. 1972).
“Plaintiff’s claim that the statute imposes an unconstitutional burden upon applicants for licenses by requiring them to come to Baltimore, Maryland, to appear before the Circuit Court to contest the issue of obscenity is highly frivolous inasmuch as the business operations…”
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Hanley, 140 F. Supp. 206 (W.D. Mich. 1956).
“1620 , Justice Frankfurter said: “Although the District Court had jurisdiction of the suit under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 100 , it was under no compulsion to exercise that jurisdiction.”
Brennan v. City of Leominster, 180 F.R.D. 192 (D. Mass. 1998).
“” 28 U.S.C. § 100 . In contrast, the statute governing the organization of the District of Massachusetts provides that “Massachusetts constitutes one judicial district.”
Benford v. Am. Broad. Companies, 733 F.2d 634 (4th Cir. 1984).
“28 U.S.C. § 100 . . Nor need we determine whether the District Court’s modification of the subpoena duces tecum to provide for inspection and copying of the documents in the Clerk’s custody, apart from the taking of a deposition, invalidates the subpoena.”
Milani Constr., LLC v. City of Frederick, No. 1:20-cv-02944 (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2021).
“§ 100 (1) (specifying that “Court for the Northern Division” of Maryland—the division that includes Frederick—‘shall be held at Baltimore, Cumberland, and Denton”); Court Locations, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, http://www.”
Brown v. Nat'l Basketball Ass'n (NBA), No. 1:19-cv-06434 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2019).
“§113 (c)); Forest Park, Clayton County, Georgia (in the Northern District of Georgia, see § 90(a)(2)); and possibly, Baltimore, Maryland (in the District of Maryland, see 28 U.S.C. § 100 (1)). Accordingly, under § 1391(b)(2), the United States District Courts for the Western…”
Jiggetts v. State of Maryland, No. 1:20-cv-04910 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2020).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 100 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Maryland, 28 U.”
Hafen v. US Custom & Border Prot., No. 1:22-cv-07277 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2022).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 100 (1). Venue for Plaintiff’s FTCA claim is therefore proper in both the Eastern District of New York, and in the Northern District of Maryland, and the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 28 U.”
Presidential Candidate No. P60005535 v. Moore, No. 1:25-cv-00407 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2025).
“Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 100 , Maryland constitutes one judicial district, located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.”
Muse v. Warden, No. 1:25-cv-06691 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2025).
“28 U.S.C. § 100 . Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Court transfers this petition to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.