U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART III— COURT OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES › Chapter CHAPTER 49— DISTRICT COURTS

28 U.S.C. § 752

Law clerks and secretaries

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

District judges may appoint necessary law clerks and secretaries subject to any limitation on the aggregate salaries of such employees which may be imposed by law. A law clerk appointed under this section shall be exempt from the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, unless specifically included by the appointing judge or by local rule of court.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1929–2015 · leading case: Danos v. Jones
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Danos v. Jones (2011) ca5 · cites it 3× “Because a federal judge is entitled under the Constitution to hold office “during good Behaviour,” U.”
Jody Ann Geras v. Lafayette Display Fixtures, Inc., United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee (1984) ca7 “” The judge cannot do this even if the parties consent, and even though the statute authorizing federal district judges to appoint law clerks ( 28 U.S.C. § 752 ) does not specify the duties of.”
Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca Corporation (1978) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 752 (1970). The law clerk has no statutorily defined duties but rather performs a broad range of functions to assist his judge.”
Danos v. Jones (2010) laed · cites it 2× “2 Danos *497 states that the Judicial Council improperly infringed the appointment power of Judge Porteous under 28 U.S.C. § 752 . 3 Danos further alleges that the Judicial Council’s order was actually disciplinary, and has included within her Complaint the text of letters…”
Garcia v. Williams (1988) cand · cites it 2× “While there is no explicit statutory language expressly providing that plaintiff is removable by the court (See 28 U.S.C. § 752 (1988)), plaintiffs allegations of defendant Williams’ statements do not indicate any explicit understanding that she would only be fired for cause as…”
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Fola Coal Co. (2015) wvsd “28 U.S.C. § 752 . Law clerks are considered part of a judge’s personal staff.”
In re Jackson (1929) nynd “Section 9391 of the Revised Statutes 28 USCA § 752) provides that this airplane, if not released under bond, must, upon condemnation, be sold at public auction.”
Bear v. Potter (1999) ncwd “In 1948, Congress enacted 28 U.S.C. § 752 which authorizes district courts to employ law clerks.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.