29 U.S.C. § 205
Repealed. Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, § 8103(c)(1)(A), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 189
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1940–2021 · leading case: Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs, 30 F. Supp. 995 (S.D. Cal. 1940).
Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs, 30 F. Supp. 995 (S.D. Cal. 1940). “29 U.S.C.A. § 205 (a). Commerce is defined as “trade, commerce, transportation, transmission, or communication among the several States or from any State to any place outside thereof.”
S. Garment Mfrs. Ass'n v. Fleming, 122 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1941). “28 29 U.S.C.A. § 205 (a). 29 29 U.S.C.A. § 203 (h).”
Moreau v. Harris Cnty., 158 F.3d 241 (5th Cir. 1998). “29 U.S.C. § 205 ; Skidmore v. Swift & Co.”
Berger v. Nazametz, 157 F. Supp. 2d 998 (S.D. Ill. 2001). “4809 ; 29 U.S.C. § 205 (g)(3) (1995); 26 U.S.C. § 417 (e)(3) (1995).”
Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. Corp., 125 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1941). “The defendant’s last argument is based upon §§ 5 and 8, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 205 , 208, which prove, it says, that the act covers only the employees of employers who are themselves “engaged in” interstate commerce.”
LaVigna v. WABC Television, Inc., 159 F.R.D. 432 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). “For similar reasons, I find plaintiff’s attorney’s act of stating a claim under the anti-retaliation clause of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 205 et seq. (“FLSA”) sanetionable.”
Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp. v. Gen. Tel. & Elec. Corp., 351 F. Supp. 1153 (D. Haw. 1972). “See 29 U.S.C. § 205 (1970). 254 . 26 U.S.C. § 4911 et seq.”
Andree & Seedman, Inc. v. Adm'r of Wage & Hour Div. of United States Dep't of Labor, 122 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1941). “Affirmed, Southern Garment Manufacturers Ass’n, Inc., et al.”
Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., 7 F. Supp. 3d 689 (E.D. Ky. 2014). “§ 417 (e)(3); see also, 29 U.S.C. § 205 (g). The PPA also replaced the 1994 GAR Mortality Table as the “applicable mortality table” used for lump sum calculations, to a mortality table under I.”
Wirtz v. Melos Constr. Corp., 408 F.2d 626 (2d Cir. 1969). “The Section 2(c) definition of an “enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce,” see note 1, supra, was incorporated by Sections 4, 5(b), 6(a), 7 and 8 of the Pair Labor Standards Amendments of 1961, Pub.”
Red Star Mfg. Co. v. Grimes, 221 F.2d 524 (D.C. Cir. 1954). “29 U.S.C.A. § 205 (a). . 29 U.S.C.A. § 208 (a).”
Sindicato Puertorriqueno De Trabajadores v. Brennan, 530 F.2d 1023 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “In accordance with § 5, 29 U.S.C. § 205 , the Secretary appoints to these tripartite bodies an equal number of members representing the public, employers in the industry, and employees in the industry, and aids in securing the information and witnesses necessary to committee…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.