29 U.S.C. § 49

United States Employment Service established

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to promote the establishment and maintenance of a national system of public employment service offices, the United States Employment Service shall be established and maintained within the Department of Labor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 105 cases, 1961–2018 · leading case: Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. Barez, 458 U.S. 592 (1982).
Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. Barez, 458 U.S. 592 (1982). · cites it 6× “113 , 29 U. S. C. § 49 et seq., and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 66 Stat.”
Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980). · cites it 2× “113 , 29 U. S. C. § 49 et seq.; see § 49g (employment of farm laborers).”
De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 514 F. Supp. 68 (C.D. Ill. 1981). · cites it 4× “To recruit workers for its operation Stokely uses the Interstate Recruitment System established under the Wagner-Peyser Act, 29 U.S.C. § 49 et seq. In each of the years, 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1980, which are the times in question in this case, Stokely prepared and submitted…”
Judith Ann Petersen v. Talisman Sugar Corp., 478 F.2d 73 (5th Cir. 1973). · cites it 5× “29 U.S.C. § 49 (b). As we said in Gomez v.”
United States Ex Rel. Gagne v. City of Worcester, 565 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2009). “The Wagner-Peyser Act, 29 U.S.C. § 49 et seq., enacted in 1933, was amended by the WIA.”
Jorge E. Arriaga v. Florida Pac. Farms, L.L.C., 305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002). “1995) (clearance orders issued pursuant to the Wagner-Peyser Act of 1933, 29 U.S.C. § 49 et seq., a very similar federal statute for foreign agricultural workers, are employment contracts enforceable under Florida law).”
Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez & Albert Solis, Defendants, 713 F.2d 225 (7th Cir. 1983). “The complaint asserted causes of action under FLCRA, the Wagner-Peyser Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 49 (a)-(k); and the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.”
Rios v. Marshall, 530 F. Supp. 351 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). · cites it 2× “, and the Wagner-Peyser National Employment System Act, 29 U.S.C. § 49 et seq. Plaintiffs seek declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief.”
Richard A. Batterton, Sec'y of Emp. & Soc. Servs. of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Sec'y of Labor, 648 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “Known as the “Handbook” method, 6 this approach draws on data collected by the nationwide network of state employment security agencies created under the Wagner-Peyser Act of 1933, 29 U.S.C. §§ 49 et seq. (1976). These state agencies maintain unemployment insurance data from…”
W. Colorado Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Marshall, 473 F. Supp. 693 (D. Colo. 1979). · cites it 4× “I Pursuant to the Wagner-Peyser Act, 29 U.S.C. § 49 , et seq., the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.”
Erspamer Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Labor, 333 N.W.2d 646 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “(1976); 29 U.S.C. § 49 (1976) (the Wagner-Peyser Act); 1B Unempl.”
Fidel Nieto-Santos v. Fletcher Farms, 743 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1984). · cites it 3× “§§ 1101-1525 , the Wagner-Peyser Act (“WPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 49 , and the regulations promulgated pursuant to these statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.