30 U.S.C. § 1251
Environmental protection standards
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(B), is act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, 62 Stat. 1155, as amended generally by Pub. L. 92–500, § 2,
The Clean Air Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(B), is act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322, which is classified generally to chapter 85 (§ 7401 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of Title 42 and Tables.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1978–2017 · leading case: Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (1981).
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (1981). “Section 501, 30 U. S. C. § 1251 (1976 ed., Supp. III), establishes a two-stage program for the regulation of surface coal mining: an initial, or interim regulatory phase, and a subsequent, permanent phase.”
Shawnee Coal Co. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, 661 F.2d 1083 (6th Cir. 1981). “§ 501(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (a), requires the Secretary to promulgate interim regulations for surface coal mining and reclamation operations within ninety days of the statute’s enactment.”
In Re Permanent Surface Mining Reg. Litig.. Appeal of Peabody Coal Co., 653 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “” 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (b) (emphasis added). This language can be read to allow regulations detailing minimum standards that all state programs must meet to receive the Secretary’s approval.”
In re Surface Mining Reg. Litig., 627 F.2d 1346 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “Section 501(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (a), requires the Secretary to promulgate interim regulations for surface coal mining and reclamation operations within ninety days of the statute’s enactment.”
Holmes Limestone Co. v. Cecil B. Andrus, 655 F.2d 732 (6th Cir. 1981). “The Secretary is directed by 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (a) to promulgate regulations governing the initial program and by § 1251(b) to promulgate the permanent regulatory program.”
Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Jewell, 62 F. Supp. 3d 7 (D.D.C. 2014). “][J” 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(B). . In Count IV, the plaintiffs allege that OSM’s failure to reinitiate consultation renders the 1996 Biological Opinion invalid under the ESA.”
Wiggins v. Brazil Coal & Clay Corp., 452 N.E.2d 958 (Ind. 1983). “The Court of Appeals' decision should be vacated to clarify the preemption question, and this Court should adopt Section 858 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, reverse the trial court and remand the cause of action.”
Webb v. Fury, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20934 (W. Va. 1981). “The “full panoply” of citizens’ rights provided by the Surface Mining Act includes the right of a citizen to comment on proposed regulations, 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (Supp. III 1979); to participate in public hearings preceding the approval or disapproval of state mining control…”
B & M Coal Corp. v. Off. of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enf't, 531 F. Supp. 677 (S.D. Ind. 1982). “30 U.S.C. § 1251 (b). Additionally, § 1251(b) dictates that the Secretary create regulations establishing a permanent regulatory program, encompassing all the performance standards mandated by the Act, for those states failing to submit an acceptable program.”
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. State, 615 P.2d 847 (Mont. 1980). “30 U.S.C. § 1251 , et seq. Health and safety requirements are enforced upon strip coal miners.”
In Re Surface Mining Reg. Litig., 452 F. Supp. 327 (D.D.C. 1978). “” 30 U.S.C. § 1251 (a). Section 502(c) specifically incorporates into the interim program eight subsections of section 515 — 515(b)(2), (3), (5), (10), (13), (15), (19), and 515(d).”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Babbitt, 835 F. Supp. 654 (D.D.C. 1993). “30 U.S.C. § 1251 (b). These regulations “shall” be promulgated in accordance with subsection (a), which provides that prior to promulgation of any regulation, the Secretary must first publish the proposed regulations, allow for a period of public comment and hold at least one…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.