34 U.S.C. § 10151

Name of program

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 34 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In general

The grant program established under this part shall be known as the “Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program”.

(b) References to former programs(1) Any reference in a law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Programs, or to the Local Government Law Enforcement Block Grants program, shall be deemed to be a reference to the grant program referred to in subsection (a).(2) Any reference in a law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to section 506 of this Act as such section was in effect on the date of the enactment of the Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2009,11 See References in Text note below. shall be deemed to be a reference to section 505(a) of this Act as amended by the Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2009.1(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 500, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6091(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4329; amended Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1111(a)(2)(B), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3094.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is Pub. L. 90–351, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 197, known as the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. Former section 506 of the Act was classified to section 3756 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1111(a)(1), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3094. Section 505(a) of the Act is classified to section 10156(a) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1968 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

The Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2009, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), probably means the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109–162, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2960, which repealed former section 3756 of this title and enacted section 10156 of this title. See note above.

Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3750 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–162 substituted “Name of program” for “Name of programs” in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The grant programs established under this subchapter shall be known as the ‘Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Programs’.”

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1111(d), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3102, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [see Tables for classification] shall apply with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 5, 2006] and each fiscal year thereafter.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 20 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: City of Los Angeles v. William Barr, 941 F.3d 931 (9th Cir. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Los Angeles v. William Barr, 941 F.3d 931 (9th Cir. 2019). · cites it 3× “BARR OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises the question whether the Department of Justice (DOJ) can require recipients of a formula grant under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (Byrne JAG), 34 U.S.C. §§ 10151–10158, to comply with Department…”

City of Chicago v. Jefferson B. Sessions III, 888 F.3d 272 (7th Cir. 2018). “See 34 U.S.C. § 10151 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3750 ).”

In re State, 182 A.3d 917 (N.J. 2018). “In effect, SORNA serves as model legislation that can be adopted in part or in whole by the states.”

City of Philadelphia v. Attorney Gen. United States, 916 F.3d 276 (3rd Cir. 2019). “We consider three sources of authority offered by the Attorney General: first , the Byrne JAG statute, 34 U.S.C. §§ 10151 - 10158 ; second , the provision defining the duties of the AAG for OJP, 34 U.”

City of Chicago v. Sessions, 264 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “See, 34 U.S.C. § 10151 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3750 ).”

City of Philadelphia v. Sessions, 280 F. Supp. 3d 579 (E.D. Pa. 2017). “See 34 U.S.C. § 10151 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3750 ).”

City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Sessions, 349 F. Supp. 3d 924 (N.D. Cal. 2018). “2960 (2006) ; see also 34 U.S.C. § 10151 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3750 ).”

State v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 343 F. Supp. 3d 213 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “The Byrne JAG program is now codified at 34 U.S.C. §§ 10151 - 10158. Under the Byrne JAG program, states and localities may apply for funds to support criminal justice programs in a variety of categories, including law enforcement, prosecution, crime prevention, corrections,…”

City of Phila. v. Sessions, 309 F. Supp. 3d 289 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “All three judges on the Seventh Circuit panel agreed that the Chicago was likely to succeed on the merits of its claims that the Attorney General lacked authority under the authorizing statute to impose substantive conditions on Byrne grants, 34 U.S.C. §§ 10151 -58, and thus…”

State ex rel. Becerra v. Sessions, 284 F. Supp. 3d 1015 (N.D. Cal. 2018). “See 34 U.S.C. §§ 10151 - 10158. The Byrne JAG Program is a mandatory formula grant, meaning that funds from the grant program are awarded based on a statutorily defined formula and the federal government must disburse the grant if an applicant meets the requirements set forth in…”

In re G.H., 190 A.3d 1059 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018). “§ 20927 ; 34 U.S.C. § 10151 ). "[M]ost states, including New Jersey, have not substantially implemented SORNA.”

City of Phila. v. Sessions, 309 F. Supp. 3d 271 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “) The Byrne JAG Program is a formula grant, whose authorizing statute, 34 U.S.C. § 10151 , et seq. , allows states and localities to use grant awards for a wide variety of purposes, such as personnel, equipment, training, and other criminal justice needs.”

Show all 20 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.