38 U.S.C. § 1975
Jurisdiction of District Courts
The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: Koffarnus v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 3d 769 (W.D. Ky. 2016).
Koffarnus v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 3d 769 (W.D. Ky. 2016). “38 U.S.C. § 1975 ; see also, Foster v. United States, 111 Fed.”
Rice v. Off. of Servicemembers' Grp. Life Ins., 260 F.3d 1240 (10th Cir. 2001). “Jurisdiction Both parties concede, and the district court accepted, that federal jurisdiction over this case is conferred by 38 U.S.C. § 1975 . Nonetheless, we have an independent duty to examine our jurisdiction.”
Blackwood v. United States, 187 F. Supp. 3d 837 (W.D. Ky. 2016). “38 U.S.C. § 1975 . The United States argues that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claims because the complaint’s prayer of relief seeks a judgment of money damages.”
William E. Freeman v. Eric K. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 404 (Vet. App. 2011). “It also specifically provided for review of matters under 38 U.S.C. §§ 1975 and 1984, matters governed by chapter 37 of title 38, and matters covered by chapter 72 of title 38, which established this Court.”
McNabb v. United States Dep't of the Army, 623 F. App'x 870 (9th Cir. 2015). “38 U.S.C. § 1975 grants the district court jurisdiction over “any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon this subchapter,” i.”
R. Edward Bates, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 398 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “§ 502 (Federal Circuit jurisdiction over Administrative Procedure Act review of VA rule-making); (2) matters covered by 38 U.S.C. §§ 1975 and 1984 (jurisdiction of federal district courts over suits on Veterans' Group Life Insurance, National Service Life Insurance and U.”
Major W.D. Foster v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 658 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “38 U.S.C. § 1975 states that “[t]he district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon this subchapter [ 38 U.”
Hensley v. United States, 292 F. Supp. 3d 399 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Hensley's Injury and Medical Treatment On February 20, 2008, Hensley slipped on an icy ladder while inspecting an aircraft and fell head-first approximately 15 feet. 1 AR 2 [2], 80 [49], 553 [80], 659 [87], 778 [92].”
Moreno v. Spencer, 310 F. Supp. 3d 83 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 38 U.S.C. § 1975 (granting any district court of the United States with original jurisdiction over TSGLI claims); 38 C.”
Fermin v. United States, 268 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D.D.C. 2017). “These include review of agency rules and regulations (which is limited to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), review of matters involving service members’ life insurance pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1975 and § 1984, matters pertaining to housing and small business loans,…”
Sindram v. United States, 130 F. App'x 456 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “§ 502 , certain insurance questions under 38 U.S.C. §§ 1975 and 1984, matters relating to housing and small business loans under 38 U.”
Rich v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 3d 263 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “1 On the day of the accident, Rich was admitted to Naval Hospital Jacksonville, where he was diagnosed with a left ankle fracture and taken to surgery for irrigation and debridement of his left knee wound and debridement of abrasions on both arms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.