Notes of Decisions
Cited in
11
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case:
Bullock v. Bd. of Educ., 210 F.R.D. 556 (D. Md. 2002).
Bullock v. Bd. of Educ., 210 F.R.D. 556 (D. Md. 2002).
· cites it 3× “Washington, Kristopher Washington, and Utopia Davis have requested that they be certified as representatives of a class comprising all school-age children aged three and older who, on or after November 1, 2000:(1) have lived, live or will live in Montgomery County, Maryland; and…”
G.S. v. Rose Tree Media Sch. Distric, 914 F.3d 206 (3d Cir. 2018).
· cites it 2× “under Subtitle VII-B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act ("McKinney-Vento" or the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2) and § 11432(g)(3)(A)(i).”
N.J. v. New York, 872 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 2011).
“42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(A),(B)(i). As part of its purpose to “ensure that each child of a homeless individual and each homeless youth has equal access to the same free, appropriate public education, .”
Mangiafico v. State Bd. of Educ., 53 A.3d 1066 (Conn. App. Ct. 2012).
“42 U.S.C. § 11434a (2). The unchallenged findings of the hearing board reflect that, at all times relevant to this appeal, the plaintiffs family was living at the New Britain property.”
G.S. v. Rose Tree Media Sch. Distric, No. 17-2886 (3d Cir. Jan. 22, 2019).
· cites it 2× “under Subtitle VII-B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (“McKinney-Vento” or the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2) and § 11432(g)(3)(A)(i).”
Gloria Johnson v. City of Grants Pass, 72 F.4th 878 (9th Cir. 2023).
· cites it 2× “5 , or the McKinney- Vento Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2), the federal law regarding the right of homeless children to a public education.”
Student Doe v. Perille, No. 1:18-cv-11875 (D. Mass. Nov. 6, 2018).
· cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(A). This definition includes “children and youths who are sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to the lack of alternative…”
Martin v. Piserchia, No. 1:23-cv-21669, 2024 WL 3812071 (D.N.J. Aug. 14, 2024).
“42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(B)(i). obvious dispute between Ms.”
Stephens, No. 2:24-cv-01703 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2025).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2). the Riverview School District.”
42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2): 4 cases
G.S. v. Rose Tree Media Sch. Distric, 914 F.3d 206 (3d Cir. 2018).
“under Subtitle VII-B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act ("McKinney-Vento" or the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2) and § 11432(g)(3)(A)(i).”
G.S. v. Rose Tree Media Sch. Distric, No. 17-2886 (3d Cir. Jan. 22, 2019).
“under Subtitle VII-B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (“McKinney-Vento” or the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2) and § 11432(g)(3)(A)(i).”
Gloria Johnson v. City of Grants Pass, 72 F.4th 878 (9th Cir. 2023).
“5 , or the McKinney- Vento Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2), the federal law regarding the right of homeless children to a public education.”
Stephens, No. 2:24-cv-01703 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2025).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2). the Riverview School District.”
42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(A): 4 cases
N.J. v. New York, 872 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 2011).
“42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(A),(B)(i). As part of its purpose to “ensure that each child of a homeless individual and each homeless youth has equal access to the same free, appropriate public education, .”
Student Doe v. Perille, No. 1:18-cv-11875 (D. Mass. Nov. 6, 2018).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(A). This definition includes “children and youths who are sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to the lack of alternative…”
42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(B): 1 case
Student Doe v. Perille, No. 1:18-cv-11875 (D. Mass. Nov. 6, 2018).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(A). This definition includes “children and youths who are sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to the lack of alternative…”
42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(B)(i): 1 case
Martin v. Piserchia, No. 1:23-cv-21669, 2024 WL 3812071 (D.N.J. Aug. 14, 2024).
“42 U.S.C. § 11434a(2)(B)(i). obvious dispute between Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.