42 U.S.C. § 629

Purpose

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this program is to enable States to develop and establish, or expand, and to operate coordinated programs of community-based family support services, family preservation services, family reunification services, and adoption promotion and support services to accomplish the following objectives:(1) To prevent child maltreatment among families at risk through the provision of supportive family services.(2) To assure children’s safety within the home and preserve intact families in which children have been maltreated, when the family’s problems can be addressed effectively.(3) To address the problems of families whose children have been placed in foster care so that reunification may occur in a safe and stable manner in accordance with the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997.(4) To support adoptive families by providing support services as necessary so that they can make a lifetime commitment to their children.(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IV, § 430, as added Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, § 13711(a)(2), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 649; amended Pub. L. 105–89, title III, § 305(a)(1), (2), (b)(3)(A), Nov. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 2130, 2131; Pub. L. 107–133, title I, § 101, Jan. 17, 2002, 115 Stat. 2414; Pub. L. 109–288, § 3(d), Sept. 28, 2006, 120 Stat. 1235; Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title VII, § 50721(b)(1), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 245.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, referred to in par. (3), is Pub. L. 105–89, Nov. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 2115. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1997 Amendment note set out under section 1305 of this title and Tables.

Prior Provisions

A prior section 430 of act Aug. 14, 1935, was classified to section 630 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–485, title II, § 202(a), Oct. 13, 1988, 102 Stat. 2377.

Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–123 struck out “time-limited” before “family reunification services” in introductory provisions.

2006—Pub. L. 109–288 substituted “Purpose” for “Findings and purpose” in section catchline, struck out subsec. (a) relating to findings, and struck out subsec. (b) designation and heading before “The purpose”.

2002—Pub. L. 107–133 amended section generally, substituting subsecs. (a) and (b) relating to findings and purpose for former subsecs. (a) to (d) relating to purposes, limitations on authorizations of appropriations, description of amounts, inflation percentage, and reservation of certain amounts.

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–89, § 305(b)(3)(A), substituted “, community-based family support services, time-limited family reunification services, and adoption promotion and support services” for “and community-based family support services”.

Subsec. (b)(6) to (8). Pub. L. 105–89, § 305(a)(1), added pars. (6) to (8).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 105–89, § 305(a)(2), substituted “1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001” for “and 1998” in pars. (1) and (2).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–123 effective Oct. 1, 2018, subject to transition rules for required State legislation or tribal action, see section 50734 of Pub. L. 115–123, set out as a note under section 622 of this title.

Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–288 effective Oct. 1, 2006, and applicable to payments under this part and part E of this subchapter for calendar quarters beginning on or after such date, without regard to whether implementing regulations have been promulgated, and with delay permitted if State legislation is required to meet additional requirements, see section 12(a), (b) of Pub. L. 109–288, set out as a note under section 621 of this title.

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–133, title III, § 301, Jan. 17, 2002, 115 Stat. 2425, provided that:“(a)In General.—Subject to subsection (b), the amendments made by this Act [enacting sections 629f to 629i of this title and amending this section and sections 629a, 629c, 629d, 629e, 674, and 677 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 17, 2002].“(b)Delay Permitted if State Legislation Required.—In the case of a State plan under subpart 2 of part B or part E of the Social Security Act [probably means subpart 2 of part B or part E of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629 et seq., 670 et seq.)] that the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines requires State legislation (other than legislation appropriating funds) in order for the plan to meet the additional requirements imposed by the amendments specified in subsection (a) of this section, the State plan shall not be regarded as failing to comply with the requirements of such part solely on the basis of the failure of the plan to meet the additional requirements before the first day of the first calendar quarter beginning after the close of the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 17, 2001]. For purposes of the preceding sentence, in the case of a State that has a 2-year legislative session, each year of the session shall be deemed to be a separate regular session of the State legislature.”

Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–89 effective Nov. 19, 1997, except as otherwise provided, with delay permitted if State legislation is required, see section 501 of Pub. L. 105–89, set out as a note under section 622 of this title.

Effective Date

Subpart effective with respect to calendar quarters beginning on or after Oct. 1, 1993, see section 13711(c) of Pub. L. 103–66, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 622 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 30 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. A.J. (In re A.G.), 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 239 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. A.J. (In re A.G.), 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 239 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). · cites it 2× “The court placed the children with their mother under a plan of family maintenance services and ordered the Agency to continue to provide visitation and discretionary services to A.”

San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Christina N., 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7748 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005). “) If, after the state has made reasonable reunification efforts, the court finds there is not a substantial probability the child safely can be returned home, the court terminates reunification services and sets a permanency hearing under section 366.”

In The Interest Of J.e., Minor Child, R.e., Mother Vs. State Of Iowa, 723 N.W.2d 793 (Iowa 2006). · cites it 2× “’ ” (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 629 (a)(7))); 42 U.S.C. § 675 (5) (requiring the state to file a petition to terminate parental rights if the child has remained in foster care “for 15 of the most recent 22 months”).”

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dep't of Pub. Welfare v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 785 (Fed. Cl. 2001). · cites it 3× “This seems to be the reason why, without informing the Court, Plaintiff changed the statutory basis of its claim from subpart 2 ( 42 U.S.C. § 629 et seq.) to subpart 1 ( 42 U.”

Charles Gresham v. Alex Azar, II, 950 F.3d 93 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “§ 601 (a) (articulating the purposes of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program); 42 U.S.C. § 629 (announcing the “objectives” of the Promoting Safe and Stable Families program), it does have a provision that articulates the reasons underlying the appropriations of…”

In Re Maria R., 185 Cal. App. 4th 48 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). “1; 42 U.S.C. §§ 629 , 629a .) *Page 71 Guadalupe and Maria had been sexually abused by George, and they could not look to R.”

In the Matter of the Adoption of: MAJB, minor child, DLB & DAB v., 2020 WY 157 (Wyo. 2020). “42 U.S.C.A. § 629 (West 2018). 7 Alternate methods of adoption are: (1) an adopted child adoption; and (2) an orphan child adoption.”

State ex rel. H.A.B., 49 So. 3d 345 (La. 2010). “” See 42 U.S.C.A. § 629 (b)(3). State in the Interest of J.”

In the Interest of C.M., 652 N.W.2d 204 (Iowa 2002). “” See 42 U.S.C. § 629 (a)(7). In response to these developments, the Iowa Supreme Court adopted amendments to the Iowa Rules of Appellate Procedure to expedite the disposition of termination appeals.”

Keweenaw Bay Indian Cmty. v. Rising, 569 F.3d 589 (6th Cir. 2009). “”); and 42 U.S.C. §§ 629 -629i, 1396-1396c, 1786, and 9858c-g.”

Keweenaw Bay Indian Cmty. v. Kleine, 546 F. Supp. 2d 509 (W.D. Mich. 2008). · cites it 2× “00 payable for the Federal Safe and Stable Families Program, 42 U.S.C. § 629 , and $928.28 payable for the Federal Child Day Care Program, 42 U.”

State ex rel. J.M., 837 So. 2d 1247 (La. 2003). “” See 42 U.S.C.A. § 629 (b)(3). Hence, the primary goal is to reunite the family.”

Show all 30 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.