42 U.S.C. § 6702
Direct grants; Federal share
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1977–2019 · leading case: Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980).
Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980). “999 , 42 U. S. C. § 6702 . [10] 90 Stat. 1000 , 42 U.”
City of Benton Harbor v. Richardson, 429 F. Supp. 1096 (W.D. Mich. 1977). “See 42 U.S. C.A. § 6702. It authorized an appropriation of $2 billion ($2,000,000,000) 1 for these purposes ( 42 U.”
City of Grand Rapids v. Richardson, 429 F. Supp. 1087 (W.D. Mich. 1977). “See 42 U.S. C.A. § 6702. It authorized an appropriation of $2 billion ($2,000,000,000) 1 for these purposes ( 42 U.”
Clark v. Richardson, 431 F. Supp. 105 (D.N.J. 1977). “Section 103(a), 42 U.S.C. § 6702 (a). The Secretary is to act through the Economic Development Administration.”
Williams v. Babbitt, 115 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 1997). “§§ 5302 (a)(17), 5306 (native villages eligible for HUD grants); 42 U.S.C. §§ 6702 , 6707(a)(1), (h)(2)(B) (public works set asides for native villages and tribes); 42 U.”
Carolinas Branch, Associated Gen. Contractors of Am., Inc. v. Kreps, 442 F. Supp. 392 (D.S.C. 1977). “The Act is discretionary, (see language in 42 U.S.C. § 6702 ). The funds can purportedly be withheld.”
Carolinas Branch, Associated, Etc. v. Kreps, 442 F. Supp. 392 (D.S.C. 1977). “The Act is discretionary, (see language in 42 U.S.C. § 6702 ). The funds can purportedly be withheld.”
Dow v. Hc2, Inc. (D.D.C. 2019). “See 42 U.S.C. § 6702 (a)(1). 5 performed.” Id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.