U.S. Code » Title 43 » Chapter CHAPTER 38— CRUDE OIL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

43 U.S.C. § 2003

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this chapter—(1) The term “northern tier States” means the States of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio.(2) The term “inland States” means those States in the United States other than northern tier States and the States of California, Alaska, and Hawaii.(3) The term “crude oil transportation system” means a crude oil delivery system (including the location of such system) for transporting Alaskan and other crude oil to northern tier States and inland States, but such term does not include the Long Beach-Midland project.(4) The term “Long Beach-Midland project” means the crude oil delivery system which was the subject of, and is generally described in, the “Final Environmental Impact Statement, Crude Oil Transportation System: Valdez, Alaska, to Midland, Texas (as proposed by Sohio Transportation Company)”, the availability of which was announced by the Department of the Interior in the Federal Register on June 1, 1977 (42 Fed. Reg. 28008).(5) The term “Federal agency” means an Executive agency, as defined in section 105 of title 5.(Pub. L. 95–617, title V, § 503, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3158.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesDefinitions

The definition of “State” in section 2602 of Title 16, Conservation, applies to this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1981–2016 · leading case: No Oilport! v. Carter, 520 F. Supp. 334 (W.D. Wash. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
No Oilport! v. Carter, 520 F. Supp. 334 (W.D. Wash. 1981). “The northern tier states, as defined in 43 U.S.C. § 2003 (1), are Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio.”
McDaniel v. Vilsack (D.D.C. 2016). “McDaniel’s supervisors discriminated against him because of his race and sex by harassing him and terminating his employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 43 U.S.C. § 2003 , et seq., and 42 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.