44 U.S.C. § 3302
Regulations covering lists of records for disposal, procedure for disposal, and standards for reproduction
The Archivist shall promulgate regulations, not inconsistent with this chapter, establishing—(1) procedures for the compiling and submitting to the Archivist of lists and schedules of records proposed for disposal,(2) procedures for the disposal of records authorized for disposal, and(3) standards for the reproduction of records by photographic, microphotographic, or digital processes with a view to the disposal of the original records.(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1299; Pub. L. 94–575, § 4(c)(1), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2727; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, § 107(b)(23), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2290; Pub. L. 113–187, §§ 5(b), 8(12), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2010, 2012.)Historical and Revision NotesBased on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., § 367 (July 7, 1943, ch. 192, § 2, 57 Stat. 381; June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, § 104, 63 Stat. 381).
Editorial NotesAmendments2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–187, § 8(12), substituted “the Archivist” for “him”.
Par. (3). Pub. L. 113–187, § 5(b), substituted “photographic, microphotographic, or digital processes” for “photographic or microphotographic processes”.
1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted “Archivist” for “Administrator of General Services”.
1976—Pub. L. 94–575 struck out “; approval by President” after “standards for reproduction” in section catchline.
Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1984 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Am. Friends Serv. Comm. v. William H. Webster, 720 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
· cites it 2× “But the quoted passage from the “General Statement” section of the 1950 Senate Report is not a good source of evaluating whether plaintiffs’ interests might be within the “zone” of the records laws concerning disposal, see 44 U.S.C. §§ 3302 , 3303, 3303a, because the disposal…”
Armstrong v. Exec. Off. of the President, 810 F. Supp. 335 (D.D.C. 1993).
· cites it 2× “See 44 U.S.C. §§ 3302 , 3303, 3303a. The Court does not agree with the extreme positions taken by either party.”
Est. of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc., 184 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (N.D. Ga. 2002).
“§ 2104 (a) (2001); see also 44 U.S.C. § 3302 (2001). In this vein, the Records Management Policies provide judicial staff with extensive guidance to ensure (A) The preservation of records of permanent value; (B) The appropriate disposition of other records as soon as they have…”
United States v. Dixon, 355 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“See 44 U.S.C. § 3302 - 14 (articulating procedures governing the disposal of records).”
Pub. Citizen v. John Carlin, 184 F.3d 900 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
“Public Citizen also challenges as arbitrary and capricious the Archivist’s determination that electronic mail and word processing files lack sufficient value to warrant continued preservation after they have been copied and placed in an agency recordkeeping system.”
Admissibility in Fed. Court of Elec. Copies of Pers. Records (OLC 2008).
“of lists and schedules of records proposed for disposal, (2) procedures for the disposal of records authorized for disposal, and (3) standards for the reproduction of records by photographic or microphotographic processes with a view to the disposal of the original records,” 44…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.