Nothing in this subchapter, section 11331 of title 40, or section 20 of the National Standards 11 So in original. Probably should be “National Institute of Standards”. and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3) may be construed as affecting the authority of the President, the Office of Management and Budget or the Director thereof, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or the head of any agency, with respect to the authorized use or disclosure of information, including with regard to the protection of personal privacy under section 552a of title 5, the disclosure of information under section 552 of title 5, the management and disposition of records under chapters 22 So in original. Probably should be “chapter”. 29, 31, or 33 of title 44, the management of information resources under subchapter I of chapter 35 of this title, or the disclosure of information to the Congress or the Comptroller General of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp., 348 F. Supp. 3d 394 (M.D. Penn. 2018).
· cites it 2× “" 44 U.S.C. § 3558 . Thus, by its plain language, FISMA countenances that information protected by mandated information security standards may be released in accordance with the Privacy Act, which, as previously noted, provides for a release of protected records in court-ordered…”
Long v. Immigr. & Customs Enf't, 149 F. Supp. 3d 39 (D.D.C. 2015).
“” 44 U.S.C. § 3558 . Therefore, Defendants’ claim that the requested materials can be withheld pursuant to Exemption 3 fails.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.