46 U.S.C. § 13110
Repealed. Pub. L. 115–282, title VI, § 601(c)(4)(A), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4289]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1991–2007 · leading case: Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (2002).
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (2002). “Before exercising that authority, *58 the Coast Guard must consider certain factors, such as the extent to which the proposed regulation will contribute to boating safety, and must consult with a special National Boating Safety Advisory Council appointed pursuant to § 33 of the…”
Lady v. Neal Glaser Marine, Inc., 228 F.3d 598 (5th Cir. 2000). “” 46 U.S.C. § 13110 (a). Section 13110(b) specifies the composition of the Advisory Council as follows: "(b)(1) The membership of the Council shall consist of— (A) 7 representatives of State officials responsible for State boating safety programs; (B) 7 representatives of…”
Mowery v. Mercury Marine, Div. of Brunswick Corp., 773 F. Supp. 1012 (N.D. Ohio 1991). “46 U.S.C.A. § 13110 . Its membership consists of: seven representatives of state officials responsible for state boating safety programs; seven representatives of recreational vessel manufacturers and associated equipment manufacturers; and seven representatives of national…”
Shields v. Outboard Marine Corp., 776 F. Supp. 1579 (M.D. Ga. 1991). “§ 4302 (c)(4), a body established by the Act and whose members are appointed by the Secretary, 46 U.S.C. § 13110 . Acting under its statutory authority, the Coast Guard directed NBSAC to examine the feasibility of propeller guards designed to prevent accidents such as the one…”
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 729 N.E.2d 45 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “See 46 U.S.C. § 13110 (1994). C. Regulating the Use of Propeller Guards In 1988, the Coast Guard directed the NBSAC to examine the feasibility and potential safety advantages and disadvantages of propeller guards.”
Folsom v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A., 509 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (M.D. Ga. 2007). “” 46 U.S.C. § 13110 (a). The Advisory Council is comprised of seven representatives from each of three industry groups: (1) "State officials responsible for State boating safety programs;” (2) "recreational vessel manufacturers and associated equipment manufacturers;” and (3)…”
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “See 46 U.S.C. § 13110 . C. Regulating the use of propeller guards In 1988, the Coast Guard directed the NBSAC to examine the feasibility and potential safety advantages and disadvantages of propeller guards.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.