49 U.S.C. § 11704
Rights and remedies of persons injured by rail carriers
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11705 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a).
A prior section 11704, Pub. L. 95–473,
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 46
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Elam v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 635 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2011).
Elam v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 635 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2011). “” 49 U.S.C. § 11704 (c)(1). Subsection (b) states “[a] rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part is liable for damages sustained by a person as a result of an act or omission of that carrier in violation of this part.”
Chessie Logistics Co., LLC v. Krinos Holdings, Inc., 867 F.3d 852 (7th Cir. 2017). “49 U.S.C. § 11704 (b), (c)(1). Or the Board can initiate an investigation it- self and take “appropriate action to compel compliance.”
Pejepscot Indus. Park, Inc. v. Maine Cent. R.R., 215 F.3d 195 (1st Cir. 2000). “49 U.S.C. § 11704 (c)(1) (emphasis added).”
Rushing v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 194 F. Supp. 2d 493 (S.D. Miss. 2001). “§ 11101 (a), because of the provisions found at 49 U.S.C. § 11704 (c). Title 49 U.S.C. § 11704 provides, in relevant part: (b) A rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the [STB] under this part is liable for damages sustained by a person as a result…”
Mitchell v. Advanced HCS, 28 F.4th 580 (5th Cir. 2022). “” 49 U.S.C. § 11704 (c)(1). Jurisdiction over those civil actions resides with “the district courts of the United States” and “State court[s] of general jurisdiction having jurisdiction of the parties.”
Tammy Skidmore v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co, 1 F.4th 206 (4th Cir. 2021). “” 49 U.S.C. § 11704 (b). Section 11704 also provides that “[a] person may file a complaint with the Board under section 11701(b) of this title or bring a civil action under subsection (b) of this section to enforce liability against a rail carrier providing 17 transportation…”
Rymes Heating Oils, Inc. v. Springfield Terminal Ry. Co., 358 F.3d 82 (1st Cir. 2004). “Rymes then sued in federal court, invoking a provision of the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA), 49 U.S.C. §§ 11704 (b), and saying, based on the administrative order, that it was entitled to damages flowing from the misrepresentations.”
Griffioen v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Ry. Co., 785 F.3d 1182 (8th Cir. 2015). “49 U.S.C. § 11704 (b)-(c). The cause of action, however, is available only for “violation[s] of this part” — i e.”
Fitzpatrick v. Morgan S., Inc., 261 F. Supp. 2d 978 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). “2000) (discussing 49 U.S.C. §§ 11704 (b), (c)(1)); Engelhard Corp.”
Chicago & North W. Transp. Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co., 450 U.S. 311 (1981). “See 49 U. S. C. § 11704 (1976 ed., Supp. III).”
New England Cent. R.R. v. Springfield Terminal Ry. Co., 415 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D. Mass. 2006). “Counts I through IV are federal claims: failure to obey an order of the STB (the Agreement) in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11704 (a) (Counts I and II); and failure to obey an order of the STB to pay damages specified under the Agreement in violation of 49 U.”
PCS Phosphate Co., Inc. v. Norfolk S. Corp., 559 F.3d 212 (4th Cir. 2009). “49 U.S.C. § 11704 provides a cause of action for a person injured by a rail carrier that "does not obey an order of the Board,” id.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 11704(b) — 1 case
The Dep't of Transp. of the State of Illinois v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. (S.D. Ill. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.