49 U.S.C. § 11901
General civil penalties
A prior section 11901, Pub. L. 95–473,
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1980–2007 · leading case: Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States, 733 A.2d 1055 (Md. 1999).
Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States, 733 A.2d 1055 (Md. 1999). “In other words, if it had the intent to abandon its state law property interests prior to ICC action, the railroad would have to also have intended to violate several provisions of federal law, subjecting itself to various criminal and civil sanctions.”
United States v. Alky Enter., Inc., 969 F.2d 1309 (1st Cir. 1992). “00 in civil penalties pursuant to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11901 (g). 2 The let *1311 ter, from the ICC’s Senior Trial Attorney, Stuart B.”
S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Com. Metals Co., 456 U.S. 336 (1982). “§ 16 (8) and 49 U. S. C. § 11901 (a) (1976 ed., Supp. *350 III), for each knowing violation of an order of the Commission, see, e.”
United States v. Grand Trunk W. R.R., 95 F.R.D. 463 (W.D. Mich. 1981). “§ 16 (8) (1887), as amended (now repealed and recodified under 49 U.S.C. § 11901 (a) (1978)). It seeks from the defendant certain forfeitures for allegedly failing and refusing to comply with 49 C.”
Buffalo S. R.R. v. Vill. of Croton-On-Hudson, 434 F. Supp. 2d 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). “49 U.S.C. § 11901 (a), see also Gitomer Aff.”
Gumport v. Interstate Com. Comm'n (In Re Transcon Lines), 147 B.R. 770 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1992). “49 U.S.C. § 11901 et seq. Pursuant to the Ex Parte Order, it is clear that the ICC intends to impose personal liability on bankruptcy trustees for such penalties.”
Metro Shippers, Inc. v. Life Savers, Inc., 509 F. Supp. 606 (D.N.J. 1980). “Courts, of course, may be faced with such questions in a civil or criminal penalty proceeding under 49 U.S.C. § 11901 , et seq., but inquiries directed to the determination of an association’s status de jure, as such, are obviously for the Commission.”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 529 F. Supp. 287 (N.D. Ala. 1981). “This Act, among other things, amends 49 U.S.C. § 11901 by adding the following subsection: (h) A person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission under subchapter II of chapter 105 of this title, or an officer, agent, or employee of that person, and who is required to comply…”
Overman v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 675 S.W.2d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984). “” Civil and criminal penalties are extensively provided for in 49 U.S.C.A. § 11901 , et seq., all payable to the United States Government, and this is the distinguishing feature of the Interstate Commerce Act and § 392.”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Transcon Lines, a Corp. Leonard L. Gumport, Chapter 7 Tr., 9 F.3d 64 (9th Cir. 1993). “Upon violation of such orders and injunctions, the ICC can issue substantial fines of $5,000 per day for a knowing violation of its orders, see 49 U.S.C.A. § 11901 (a) (West Supp.1993), and request the enforcement aid of the judiciary.”
Carl Attaway Parks & Bernice Parks v. Will Poindexter v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 723 F.2d 840 (11th Cir. 1984). “§§ 11903 and 11904) or to civil penalties ( 49 U.S.C. § 11901 ) or to an injunction upon suit by the Interstate Commerce Commission ( 49 U.”
Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Whittier Wood Prods. Co., 57 F.3d 642 (8th Cir. 1995). “Satisfaction of the claim under paragraph (2), (3), or (4) of this subsection shall be binding on the parties, and the parties shall not be subject to chapter 119 of this title [49 USCS §§ 11901 et seq.]. . The version of S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.