U.S. Code » Title 50 » Chapter CHAPTER 23— INTERNAL SECURITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— PERSONNEL SECURITY PROCEDURES IN NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

50 U.S.C. § 831

Regulations for employment security

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 50 CasesGoogle Scholar
Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, the Secretary of Defense (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the “Secretary”) shall prescribe such regulations relating to continuing security procedures as he considers necessary to assure—(1) that no person shall be employed in, or detailed or assigned to, the National Security Agency (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the “Agency”), or continue to be so employed, detailed, or assigned; and(2) that no person so employed, detailed, or assigned shall have access to any classified information;unless such employment, detail, assignment, or access to classified information is clearly consistent with the national security.(Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title III, § 301, as added Pub. L. 88–290, Mar. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 168.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1957–2013 · leading case: Kaplan v. Conyers, 733 F.3d 1148 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kaplan v. Conyers, 733 F.3d 1148 (Fed. Cir. 2013). · cites it 9× “Therefore, it was held that the National Security Agency was not required to apply either § 7532 or § 833 and was entitled to act 13Section 833 was a summary removal provision in the 1964 National Security Agency Personnel Security Procedures Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 831–35 (repealed…”
Dep't of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988). · cites it 2× “§§ 831 and 832 apply) is pertinent with respect to the Navy's power to dismiss an employee for cause under § 7513, that ruling would conflict with the Federal Circuit's holding in the present case that the Navy may proceed under § 7513. This Court will meet the issue in Doe when…”
John Doe v. Richard B. Cheney, Sec'y of Dep't of Def., 885 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “” 50 U.S.C. § 831 . Chapter 371 of NSA personnel management regulations, promulgated in part pursuant to § 831, includes a regulation requiring security clearance for employment at NSA.”
John Doe v. Caspar Weinberger, Sec'y, Dep't of Def., 820 F.2d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “50 U.S.C. § 831 . In cases of doubt boards of appraisal are authorized to recommend whether individuals should have access to classified information.”
Reinbold v. Evers, 187 F.3d 348 (4th Cir. 1999). “” 50 U.S.C. § 831 . The criteria for access to SCI materials are established by the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).”
United States v. Kowert, 7 C.M.A. 678 (1957). “The colonel testified that he informed the accused of the offenses of which he was suspected and advised him of his rights under Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 831 . Asked by *681 trial counsel whether the accused had made any statements to him, the…”
Stehney v. Perry, 101 F.3d 925 (3rd Cir. 1996). “If Congress intended to shield security clearance decisions affecting NSA contractor employees from APA review, it would have used language to that effect.”
Sec. Clearance Adjudications by the DOJ Access Review Comm. (OLC 2011). “III 2009); 50 U.S.C. §§ 831– 835 (2006) (governing employees of the National Security Agency).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.