7 U.S.C. § 181
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 241
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1927–2026 · leading case: Been v. O.K. Indus., Inc., 495 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2007).
Been v. O.K. Indus., Inc., 495 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2007). “This appeal presents a matter of first impression for this Circuit, namely whether § 202(a) of the Packers and Stockyards Act ("PSA"), 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq., requires a plaintiff to prove that an allegedly "unfair practice" injures or is likely to injure competition.”
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n, 356 U.S. 282 (1958). “159 , as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 181 et seq. The Regulations complained of provide: "No market agency or dealer engaging in business at this Stockyard shall, upon Stock Yard Company *284 property, or elsewhere, nor shall any other person upon Stock Yard Company property "(1)…”
Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & Trantolo, 461 A.2d 938 (Conn. 1983). “], and persons, partnerships, or corporations insofar as they are subject to the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [ 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq.], except as provided in section 406 (b) of said Act [ 7 U.”
United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409 (1941). “159 , 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq., the Secretary of Agriculture in June, 1933, issued an order setting maximum rates to be charged by market agencies for their services at the Kansas City Stockyards.”
In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig., 290 F. Supp. 3d 772 (E.D. Ill. 2017). “That case, however, involved consideration of whether Pilgrim's actions had an anticompetitive effect sufficient to demonstrate violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 181 et seq. Id. A conspiracy claim was not at issue.”
Hyatt v. Kappos, 625 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2010). “420 (1930), the Court held that although the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, 7 U.S.C. §§ 181–229, provided for suits to be brought in federal district court to enjoin the enforcement of agency orders, this did not imply a trial de novo.”
Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm'n Co., 411 U.S. 182 (1973). “159 , 7 U. S. C. § 181 et seq., wilfully violated §§ 307 (a) and 312 (a) of the Act, 7 U.”
Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., 912 F.3d 455 (8th Cir. 2018). “The Organization for Competitive Markets and three of its members petition for review of 2017 United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") orders withdrawing an interim final rule and two proposed regulations promulgated under the Packers and Stockyards Act ("PSA"), 7 U.S.C.…”
Normand Josef Enter., Inc. v. Connecticut Nat'l Bank, 646 A.2d 1289 (Conn. 1994). “], and persons, partnerships, or corporations insofar as they are subject to the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [ 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq.], except as provided in section 406 (b) of said Act [ 7 U.”
Stowers v. Mahon, 526 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir. 1976). “” The cattle had been sold for cash by the 15 cattle farmers to Samuels on various dates from May 12 through May 23, 1969, in accordance with the Packers and Stockyards Act, 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq. and regulations thereunder, on a so-called grade and yield basis.”
Henry Lee Leroy Pickett v. Iowa Beef Processors, 420 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2005). “He brought the lawsuit on behalf of all cash market sellers claiming that Tyson had engaged in unfair practices and manipulated prices in violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq. The issues this case raises, and its procedural history, are best…”
United States v. Rubashkin, 655 F.3d 849 (8th Cir. 2011). “The credit agreement between Agriprocessors and the Bank contained covenants requiring the company to comply with the Packers & Stockyards Act of 1921, 7 U.S.C. §§ 181 -229c (Packers Act). It also included a covenant that required Agriprocessors to represent to the Bank that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.