U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 57— PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION AND RIGHTS › Part Part L— Remedies for Infringement of Plant Variety Protection, and Other Actions

7 U.S.C. § 2565

Attorney fees

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985). · cites it 2× “1556 , 7 U. S. C. § 2565 . 3. Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended, 11 U.”
Nazareth Gates v. John Collier, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, 616 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir. 1980). “…Agricultural Fair Practices Act of 1967, § 6, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2305 (a), (c) (1970); Plant Variety Protection Act § 125, 7 U.S.C. § 2565 (1970); Bankruptcy Act §1,11 U.S.C. §§ 205, 641, 643, 644 (1970); Home Owners Loan Act of 1933, 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (d)(8) (1970), as amended by…”
Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal, 860 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “, 7 U.S.C. § 2565 (“The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.”
Kenny A. Ex Rel. Winn v. Perdue, 547 F.3d 1319 (11th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 2305 (a) & (c); Plant Variety Protection Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2565 ; Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, 11 U.”
Ramos v. Lamm, 539 F. Supp. 730 (D. Colo. 1982). “§ 2805 (d)(1), (3) *757 Plant Variety Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2565 Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522a(g)(2)(B), (3)(B), (4) Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.”
Coulter v. Tennessee, 805 F.2d 146 (6th Cir. 1986). “§ 2805 (d)(1), (3) Plant Variety Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2565 Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(2)(B), (3)(B), (4) Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, 42 U.”
Kenny A. v. Sonny Perdue (11th Cir. 2008). “§ 2305 (a) & (c); Plant Variety Protection Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2565 ; Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, 11 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.