7 U.S.C. § 342

Cooperative agricultural extension work; cooperation with Secretary of Agriculture

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

Cooperative agricultural extension work shall consist of the development of practical applications of research knowledge and giving of instruction and practical demonstrations of existing or improved practices or technologies in agriculture, uses of solar energy with respect to agriculture, home economics, and rural energy and subjects relating thereto to persons not attending or resident in said colleges in the several communities, and imparting information on said subjects through demonstrations, publications, and otherwise and for the necessary printing and distribution of information in connection with the foregoing; and this work shall be carried on in such manner as may be mutually agreed upon by the Secretary of Agriculture and the State agricultural college or colleges or Territory or possession receiving the benefits of this subchapter.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1949–2023 · leading case: Greg Kroupa v. Peter Nielsen, 731 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Greg Kroupa v. Peter Nielsen, 731 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 342 , 343(b)(1). “4-H clubs” are explicitly included in the “food and agricultural sciences” that are federally supported.”

B.K. ex rel. Kroupa v. 4-H, 877 F. Supp. 2d 804 (D.S.D. 2012). · cites it 2× “7 U.S.C. § 342 . “Agricultural sciences” includes 4-H clubs.”

United States v. Holdman, 75 F.4th 514 (5th Cir. 2023). “at 342 (quoting 7 U.S.C. § 342 (1914)) (alterations in original).”

Burns v. Vaughan, 224 S.W.2d 365 (Ark. 1949). “See 7 USCA § 342. Too, the appellant testified that he knew that the dust was dangerous and instructed his pilot not to release it if there was any wind.”

City of New London v. Cnty. of New London, 173 A.2d 492 (Conn. 1961). “373 , § 2, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 342 ; General Statutes § 22-11.”

Use of Appropriations to Pay Travel Expenses of Int'l Trade Admin. Fellows (OLC 2004). “7 U.S.C. § 342 (2000); see Smith-Lever Act, ch.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.