7 U.S.C. § 499f

Complaints, written notifications, and investigations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Reparation complaints(1) Petition; process

Any person complaining of any violation of any provision of section 499b of this title by any commission merchant, dealer, or broker may, at any time within nine months after the cause of action accrues, apply to the Secretary by petition, which shall briefly state the facts, whereupon, if, in the opinion of the Secretary, the facts therein contained warrant such action, a copy of the complaint thus made shall be forwarded by the Secretary to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker, who shall be called upon to satisfy the complaint, or to answer it in writing, within a reasonable time to be prescribed by the Secretary.

(2) Filing and handling fees

A person submitting a petition to the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall include a filing fee of $60 per petition. If the Secretary determines under paragraph (1) that the facts contained in the petition warrant further action, the person or persons submitting the petition shall submit to the Secretary a handling fee of $300. The Secretary may not forward a copy of the complaint to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker involved until after the Secretary receives the required handling fee. The Secretary shall deposit fees submitted under this paragraph into the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act Fund provided for by section 499c(b) of this title. The Secretary may alter the fees specified in this paragraph by rulemaking under section 553 of title 5.

(b) Disciplinary violations

Any officer or agency of any State or Territory having jurisdiction over commission merchants, dealers, or brokers in such State or Territory and any other interested person (other than an employee of an agency of the Department of Agriculture administering this chapter) may file, in accordance with rules prescribed by the Secretary, a written notification of any alleged violation of this chapter by any commission merchant, dealer, or broker. In addition, any official certificates of the United States Government or States or Territories of the United States and trust notices filed pursuant to section 499e of this title shall constitute written notification for the purposes of conducting an investigation under subsection (c). The identity of any person filing a written notification under this subsection shall be considered to be confidential information. The identity of such person, and any portion of the notification to the extent that it would indicate the identity of such person, are specifically exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act), as provided in subsection (b)(3) of such section.

(c) Investigation of complaints and notifications(1) Commencing or expanding an investigation

If there appears to be, in the opinion of the Secretary, reasonable grounds for investigating a complaint made under subsection (a) or a written notification made under subsection (b), the Secretary shall investigate such complaint or notification. In the course of the investigation, if the Secretary determines that violations of this chapter are indicated other than the alleged violations specified in the complaint or notification that served as the basis for the investigation, the Secretary may expand the investigation to include such additional violations.

(2) Issuance of complaint by Secretary; process

In the opinion of the Secretary, if an investigation under this subsection substantiates the existence of violations of this chapter, the Secretary may cause a complaint to be issued. The Secretary shall have the complaint served by registered mail or certified mail or otherwise on the person concerned and afford such person an opportunity for a hearing thereon before a duly authorized examiner of the Secretary in any place in which the subject of the complaint is engaged in business. However, in complaints wherein the amount claimed as damages does not exceed $30,000, a hearing need not be held and proof in support of the complaint and in support of respondent’s answer may be supplied in the form of depositions or verified statements of fact.

(3) Special notification requirements for certain investigations

Whenever the Secretary initiates an investigation on the basis of a written notification made under subsection (b) or expands such an investigation, the Secretary shall promptly notify the subject of the investigation of the existence of the investigation and the nature of the alleged violations of this chapter to be investigated. Not later than 180 days after providing the initial notification, the Secretary shall provide the subject of the investigation with notice of the status of the investigation, including whether the Secretary intends to issue a complaint under paragraph (2), terminate the investigation, or continue or expand the investigation. The Secretary shall provide additional status reports at the request of the subject of the investigation and shall promptly notify the subject of the investigation whenever the Secretary terminates the investigation.

(d) Decisions on complaints

After opportunity for hearing on complaints where the damages claimed exceed the sum of $30,000 has been provided or waived and on complaints where damages claimed do not exceed the sum of $30,000 not requiring hearing as provided herein, the Secretary shall determine whether or not the commission merchant, dealer, or broker has violated any provision of section 499b of this title.

(e) Bond required for certain complaints

In case a complaint is made by a nonresident of the United States, or by a resident of the United States to whom the claim of a nonresident of the United States has been assigned, the complainant shall be required, before any formal action is taken on his complaint, to furnish a bond in double the amount of the claim conditioned upon the payment of costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee for the respondent if the respondent shall prevail, and any reparation award that may be issued by the Secretary of Agriculture against the complainant on any counter claim by respondent: Provided, That the Secretary shall have authority to waive the furnishing of a bond by a complainant who is a resident of a country which permits the filing of a complaint by a resident of the United States without the furnishing of a bond.

(June 10, 1930, ch. 436, § 6, 46 Stat. 534; Apr. 13, 1934, ch. 120, §§ 8–10, 48 Stat. 586, 587; Aug. 20, 1937, ch. 719, §§ 8, 9, 50 Stat. 728; Pub. L. 86–507, § 1(4), June 11, 1960, 74 Stat. 200; Pub. L. 87–725, § 8, Oct. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 675; Pub. L. 92–231, § 1, Feb. 15, 1972, 86 Stat. 38; Pub. L. 97–98, title XI, § 1115(c), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1270; Pub. L. 97–352, § 2, Oct. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1667; Pub. L. 102–237, title X, § 1011(4), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1898; Pub. L. 104–48, §§ 7, 8(a), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 428, 429.)Editorial NotesCodification

Section was formerly classified to section 556 of this title.

Amendments

1995—Pub. L. 104–48, § 7(d)(1), substituted “Complaints, written notifications, and investigations” for “Complaint and investigation” in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–48, § 8(a), inserted subsec. heading, designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted par. (1) heading, and added par. (2).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–48, § 7(a), inserted heading and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Any officer or agency of any State or Territory having jurisdiction over commission merchants, dealers, or brokers in such State or Territory and any employee of the United States Department of Agriculture or any interested person may file, in accordance with rules and regulations of the Secretary, a complaint of any violation of any provision of this chapter by any commission merchant, dealer, or broker and may request an investigation of such complaint by the Secretary.”

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–48, § 7(b), inserted heading and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “If there appear to be, in the opinion of the Secretary, any reasonable grounds for investigating any complaint made under this section, the Secretary shall investigate such complaint and may, if in his opinion the facts warrant such action, have said complaint served by registered mail or by certified mail or otherwise on the person concerned and afford such person an opportunity for a hearing thereon before a duly authorized examiner of the Secretary in any place in which the said person is engaged in business: Provided, That in complaints wherein the amount claimed as damages does not exceed the sum of $15,000, a hearing need not be held and proof in support of the complaint and in support of respondent’s answer may be supplied in the form of depositions or verified statements of fact.”

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–48, § 7(c), (d)(2), inserted heading and substituted “$30,000” for “$15,000” in two places in text.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 104–48, § 7(d)(3), inserted heading.

1991—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 102–237 inserted a period at end of subsec. (c) and substituted a period for semicolon at end of subsec. (d).

1982—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 97–352 inserted “or by a resident of the United States to whom the claim of a nonresident of the United States has been assigned,” after “In case a complaint is made by a nonresident of the United States,”.

1981—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 97–98 substituted “$15,000” for “$3,000”.

1972—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 92–231 substituted “$3,000” for “$1,500”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–231 substituted “$3,000” for “$1,500” wherever appearing.

1962—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 87–725 substituted “$1,500” for “$500”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 87–725 substituted “$1,500” for “$500” wherever appearing.

1960—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 86–507 inserted “or by certified mail” after “registered mail”.

1937—Subsec. (b). Act Aug. 20, 1937, § 8, substituted “section 499b of this title” for “this chapter”.

Subsec. (e). Act Aug. 20, 1937, § 9, inserted “and any reparation award that may be issued by the Secretary of Agriculture against the complainant on any counter claim by respondent” and proviso.

1934—Subsec. (c). Act Apr. 13, 1934, § 8, inserted proviso.

Subsec. (d). Act Apr. 13, 1934, § 9, substituted “complaints” for “a complaint” after “on” and inserted “where damages claimed do not exceed the sum of $500 not requiring hearing as provided herein” after “complaints”.

Subsec. (e). Act Apr. 13, 1934, § 10, among other changes, inserted “formal” before “action”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1982 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–352, § 3, Oct. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1667, provided that: “The amendment made by section 2 [amending this section] shall not apply with respect to complaints made under section 6(e) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 [7 U.S.C. 499f(e)], before the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 18, 1982].”

Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–98 effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of this title.

Filing and Handling Fees During Fiscal Years 1995 and 1996

Pub. L. 103–276, § 1, July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1406, during fiscal years 1995 and 1996, directed Secretary of Agriculture to require filing fee of $60 per petition for petitions alleging violation of section 499b of this title and handling fee of $300 for petitions that warrant further action, which handling fee was to be included in determining amount of damages, with both fees to be deposited into the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act Fund, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–48, § 8(c), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 429. See subsec. (a)(2) of this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 41 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1948–2021 · leading case: Exportal Ltda., Mario Fantuzzi, & Jesus Villasante v. United States of Am. & Clayton Yeutter, Sec'y of Agric., 902 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
Exportal Ltda., Mario Fantuzzi, & Jesus Villasante v. United States of Am. & Clayton Yeutter, Sec'y of Agric., 902 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1990). · cites it 7× “See 7 U.S.C. § 499f(a), (c); 7 C.F.R. § 47.6 .”
Patterson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Crown Foods Int'l, Inc., a Corp. F/k/a Crown Food-Serv. Grp., Inc., & Philip H. Eckert, 307 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2× “On December 21, 1998, after informal attempts to- collect its debt proved fruitless, Patterson filed an administrative reparation claim pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 499f with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).”
Bocchi Americas Assocs., Inc. v. Com. Fresh Mktg., Inc., 515 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2008). “More specifically, the buyer may enforce its PACA trust rights either by seeking a reparation order from the Secretary of Agriculture and subsequent judicial enforcement, 7 U.S.C. §§ 499f, 499g, or through a civil suit against the buyer for breach of fiduciary trust, 7 U.”
Alphas Co., Inc. v. Dan Tudor & Sons Sales, Inc., 679 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “7 U.S.C. § 499f. After a hearing, or in some cases without one, 3 the Secretary may determine whether any violation of PACA has occurred and may order the losing party to make reparations to the prevailing party accordingly.”
Harland W. Chidsey, D/B/A Harland W. Chidsey Farms v. Bert A. Guerin, D/B/A Bert Geurin, 443 F.2d 584 (6th Cir. 1971). · cites it 2× “7 U.S.C. § 499f, g. A reparation order issued by the Secretary must set forth the Secretary’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
Harry Birkenfield v. United States of Am. & Orville Freeman, Sec'y of Agric., 369 F.2d 491 (3rd Cir. 1966). · cites it 2× “§ 6, 7 U.S.C. § 499f, the Secretary initiated reparation proceedings against Fort Pitt.”
Allred's Produce v. United States Dep't of Agric., 178 F.3d 743 (5th Cir. 1999). “Allred’s notes that 7 U.S.C. § 499f(b) requires such written notification prior to commencement of an official investigation, and asserts that the Secretary failed to present evidence of such notification to justify the February 1996 compliance review that resulted in the…”
Finer Foods Sales Co., Inc. v. John R. Block, Sec'y of Agric., United States Dep't of Agric., & United States of Am., 708 F.2d 774 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “According to the petitioner, the Secretary cannot issue a formal disciplinary complaint against a licensee unless the aggrieved party previously filed with the Secretary an informal complaint seeking such action, and that informal complaint was served on the licensee.”
Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Sec'y of Agric., & United States of Am., 510 F.2d 743 (D.C. Cir. 1975). ““Unless the licensee against whom a reparation order has been issued shows to the satisfaction of the Secretary within five days from the expiration of the period allowed for compliance with such order that he has either taken an appeal as herein authorized or has made payment…”
Alphas Co., Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc., 708 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2013). “7 U.S.C. § 499f. Re-latedly, Congress provided that once the Secretary issues a reparation order, an aggrieved party may appeal the order to the federal district court in the district in which the administrative hearing was held.”
Perfectly Fresh Farms, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 692 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “7 U.S.C. § 499f(c)(2). At the conclusion of such proceedings, the Secretary may issue a “reparation order” requiring the respondent to pay the “person complaining” “the amount of damage .”
Melvyn Siegel v. Richard E. Lyng, Sec'y of Agric. United States Dep't of Agric. & United States of Am., 851 F.2d 412 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “"Unless the licensee against whom a reparation order has been issued shows to the satisfaction of the Secretary within five days from the expiration of the period allowed for compliance with such order that he has either taken an appeal as herein authorized or has made payment…”
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(a) — 6 cases
Exportal Ltda., Mario Fantuzzi, & Jesus Villasante v. United States of Am. & Clayton Yeutter, Sec'y of Agric., 902 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “See 7 U.S.C. § 499f(a), (c); 7 C.F.R. § 47.6 .”
Am. Fruit Growers, Inc. v. S. T. Runzo & Co., 95 F. Supp. 842 (W.D. Pa. 1951).
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(a)(2) — 1 case
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(a)(l) — 2 cases
BT Produce Co., Inc. v. Robert A. Johnson Sales, Inc., 354 F. Supp. 2d 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).
Meza Sierra Enter., Inc. v. Dep't of Agric., 531 F. App'x 460 (5th Cir. 2013).
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(b) — 2 cases
Allred's Produce v. United States Dep't of Agric., 178 F.3d 743 (5th Cir. 1999). “Allred’s notes that 7 U.S.C. § 499f(b) requires such written notification prior to commencement of an official investigation, and asserts that the Secretary failed to present evidence of such notification to justify the February 1996 compliance review that resulted in the…”
Mandell, Spector, Rudolph Co. v. United States, 364 F.2d 889 (3rd Cir. 1966).
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(c)(2) — 4 cases
Alphas Co., Inc. v. Dan Tudor & Sons Sales, Inc., 679 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2012). “7 U.S.C. § 499f. After a hearing, or in some cases without one, 3 the Secretary may determine whether any violation of PACA has occurred and may order the losing party to make reparations to the prevailing party accordingly.”
Kirby Produce Co. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 256 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Perfectly Fresh Farms, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 692 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2012). “7 U.S.C. § 499f(c)(2). At the conclusion of such proceedings, the Secretary may issue a “reparation order” requiring the respondent to pay the “person complaining” “the amount of damage .”
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(d) — 2 cases
Perfectly Fresh Farms, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 692 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2012). “7 U.S.C. § 499f(c)(2). At the conclusion of such proceedings, the Secretary may issue a “reparation order” requiring the respondent to pay the “person complaining” “the amount of damage .”
Tom Lange Co., Inc. v. A. Gagliano Co., Inc., 61 F.3d 1305 (7th Cir. 1995).
— 7 U.S.C. § 499f(e) — 1 case
Exportal Ltda., Mario Fantuzzi, & Jesus Villasante v. United States of Am. & Clayton Yeutter, Sec'y of Agric., 902 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “See 7 U.S.C. § 499f(a), (c); 7 C.F.R. § 47.6 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.