Utah Code » Title 76, Chapter 3 — Punishments; part 76-3-2 — Sentencing
Utah Code

Utah Code § 76-3-201 (2026)

Sentences or combination of sentences allowed -- Restitution and other costs -- Civil penalties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this section:
"Convicted" means:
having entered a plea of guilty, a plea of no contest, or a plea of guilty with a mental condition; or
having received a judgment of guilty or a judgment of guilty with a mental condition.
"Convicted" does not include an adjudication of an offense under Section 80-6-701.
"Restitution" means the same as that term is defined in Section 77-38b-102.
Within the limits provided by this chapter, a court may sentence an individual convicted of an offense to any one of the following sentences, or combination of the following sentences:
to pay a fine;
to removal or disqualification from public or private office;
except as otherwise provided by law, to probation in accordance with Section 77-18-105;
in accordance with Subsection 77-18-111(4), to imprisonment;
on or after April 27, 1992, to life in prison without parole; or
to death.
In determining the appropriate sentence for an individual convicted of an offense, the court shall consider:
the nature and circumstances of the offense, including the nature and gravity of the harm caused by the individual's criminal conduct;
the history and characteristics of the individual, including the acceptance or lack of acceptance of accountability by the individual;
whether the sentence to be imposed:
reflects the seriousness of the offense, promotes respect for the law, and provides just punishment for the offense;
affords adequate deterrence of criminal conduct;
protects the public from future offenses by the individual; and
provides for the rehabilitative needs of the individual;
the adult sentencing and supervision length guidelines as defined in Section 63M-7-401.1;
the presentence investigation report described in Section 77-18-103 if a presentence investigation report has been prepared for the individual;
any aggravating factor that the court may, or is required to, consider by law for the offense;
any aggravating or mitigating circumstances; and
the desires and interests of any victim of the offense.
In determining the appropriate sentence for an individual convicted of a violent felony, as defined in Section 76-3-203.5, or a sexual offense, as defined in Section 76-3-407, the sentencing court shall prioritize the factors described in Subsections (2)(b)(i), (2)(b)(iii)(A), (2)(b)(iii)(B), and (2)(b)(iii)(C) over any interest of the defendant.
This chapter does not deprive a court of authority conferred by law:
to forfeit property;
to dissolve a corporation;
to suspend or cancel a license;
to permit removal of an individual from office;
to cite for contempt; or
to impose any other civil penalty.
A court may include a civil penalty in a sentence.
In addition to any other sentence that a sentencing court may impose, the court shall order an individual to:
pay restitution in accordance with Title 77, Chapter 38b, Crime Victims Restitution Act;
subject to Section 77-32b-104, pay the cost expended by an appropriate governmental entity under Section 77-30-24 for the extradition of the individual if the individual:
was extradited to this state, under Title 77, Chapter 30, Extradition, to resolve pending criminal charges; and
is convicted of an offense in the county for which the individual is returned;
subject to Subsection (5) and Subsections 77-32b-104(2), (3), and (4), pay the cost of medical care, treatment, hospitalization, and related transportation, as described in Section 17-63-706, that is provided by a county to the individual while the individual is in a county correctional facility before and after sentencing if:
the individual is convicted of an offense that results in incarceration in the county correctional facility; and
the individual is not a state prisoner housed in the county correctional facility through a contract with the Department of Corrections; or
the reimbursement does not duplicate the reimbursement under Section 64-13e-104 if the individual is a state probationary inmate or a state parole inmate; and
pay any other cost that the court determines is appropriate under Section 77-32b-104.
The cost of medical care under Subsection (4)(c) does not include expenses incurred by the county correctional facility in providing reasonable accommodation for an inmate qualifying as an individual with a disability as defined and covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 12101 through 12213, including medical and mental health treatment for the inmate's disability.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 125 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). · cites it 173× “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). · cites it 64× “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
State v. Shickles, 760 P.2d 291 (Utah 1988). · cites it 50× “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (6)(b) (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997). · cites it 43× “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(d)(i) (emphasis added).”
State v. Egbert, 748 P.2d 558 (Utah 1987). · cites it 48× “" [7] Any vagueness to be found in subsection 76-5-405(2), which provides for sentences of five, ten, or fifteen years and which may be for life, is dispelled by the implementing language of Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (5) (Supp. 1983) (amended 1984, 1986 & 1987), which plainly…”
State v. Bishop, 753 P.2d 439 (Utah 1988). · cites it 18× “1, amended Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (1978) by adding subsection (5).”
State v. Galli, 967 P.2d 930 (Utah 1998). · cites it 26× “Particularly, Galli contends that Judge Brian incorrectly interpreted and applied Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 when he ordered him to pay restitution to his family.”
State v. Weeks, 12 P.3d 110 (Utah Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 62× “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) & (4) (1999); State v.”
State v. Diaz, 2002 UT App 288 (Utah Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 12× “Sufficiency of the Court's Findings Supporting Diaz's Sentence ¶ 27 Diaz next argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him to the maximum possible term for child kidnaping without making the findings required under Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (6)(a), -(d) (Supp.”
State v. Strunk, 846 P.2d 1297 (Utah 1993). · cites it 18× “NOTES [1] It does not appear from the record why the prosecution did not seek to have Strunk sentenced under section 76-3-201(6)(c), which mandates the imposition of the longest mandatory sentence for child kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse of a child when "the defendant…”
State v. Anderson, 2009 UT 13 (Utah 2009). · cites it 16× “" [6] Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) (2008). [7] Second, section 77-27-1(10) defines probation as "an act of grace by the court suspending the imposition or execution of a convicted offender's sentence upon prescribed conditions.”
State v. Lebeau, 2014 UT 39 (Utah 2014). · cites it 10× “§ 76-3-201(7)(a). Section 76-3-201(7)(e) then directed the court to consider the aggravating and mitigating circumstances recognized by the Utah Sentencing Commission.”
Show all 125 citing cases →
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1) — 2 cases
Rawlings v. Holden, 869 P.2d 958 (Utah Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Dickey, 841 P.2d 1203 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1)(b) — 2 cases
State v. Galli, 967 P.2d 930 (Utah 1998). “Particularly, Galli contends that Judge Brian incorrectly interpreted and applied Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 when he ordered him to pay restitution to his family.”
State v. Mast, 40 P.3d 1143 (Utah Ct. App. 2001).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1)(c) — 3 cases
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
State v. Houston, 9 P.3d 188 (Utah Ct. App. 2000).
In Interest of Tw, 2006 UT App 259 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1)(d) — 1 case
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1)(e) — 1 case
State v. Houston, 9 P.3d 188 (Utah Ct. App. 2000).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1)(e)(i) — 3 cases
State v. Galli, 967 P.2d 930 (Utah 1998). “Particularly, Galli contends that Judge Brian incorrectly interpreted and applied Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 when he ordered him to pay restitution to his family.”
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
State v. Houston, 9 P.3d 188 (Utah Ct. App. 2000).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(1)(e)(ii) — 2 cases
State v. Houston, 9 P.3d 188 (Utah Ct. App. 2000).
In Interest of Tw, 2006 UT App 259 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(10) — 1 case
State v. Bishop, 753 P.2d 439 (Utah 1988). “1, amended Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (1978) by adding subsection (5).”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(2) — 2 cases
State v. Anderson, 2009 UT 13 (Utah 2009). “" [6] Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) (2008). [7] Second, section 77-27-1(10) defines probation as "an act of grace by the court suspending the imposition or execution of a convicted offender's sentence upon prescribed conditions.”
Richfield City v. Walker, 790 P.2d 87 (Utah Ct. App. 1990).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(2)(c) — 1 case
State v. Anderson, 2009 UT 13 (Utah 2009). “" [6] Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) (2008). [7] Second, section 77-27-1(10) defines probation as "an act of grace by the court suspending the imposition or execution of a convicted offender's sentence upon prescribed conditions.”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(2)(d) — 1 case
Salt Lake City v. Jaramillo, 2007 UT App 32 (Utah Ct. App. 2007).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(3) — 2 cases
State v. Nones, 11 P.3d 709 (Utah Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Dickey, 841 P.2d 1203 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(3)(a) — 4 cases
State v. Snyder, 747 P.2d 417 (Utah 1987).
Stilling v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & Parole, 933 P.2d 391 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Stayer, 706 P.2d 611 (Utah 1985).
State v. Dickey, 841 P.2d 1203 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(3)(a)(i) — 4 cases
State v. Robinson, 860 P.2d 979 (Utah Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Twitchell, 832 P.2d 866 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Depaoli, 835 P.2d 162 (Utah 1992).
State v. Christensen, 843 P.2d 1043 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(3)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Haston, 811 P.2d 929 (Utah Ct. App. 1991).
Stilling v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & Parole, 933 P.2d 391 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
Dep't of Emp. Sec. of the Indus. Comm'n v. Ninth Circuit Court In & for Cedar City Dep't, 718 P.2d 782 (Utah 1986).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(3)(c) — 3 cases
State v. Starnes, 841 P.2d 712 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Twitchell, 832 P.2d 866 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Stayer, 706 P.2d 611 (Utah 1985).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4) — 2 cases
State v. Poole, 2015 UT App 220 (Utah Ct. App. 2015).
State Ex Rel. Zc, 2007 UT 54 (Utah 2007).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(a) — 4 cases
State v. Mooers & Becker, 2017 UT 36 (Utah 2017).
State v. Mast, 40 P.3d 1143 (Utah Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Gibson, 2017 UT App 142 (Utah Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Mooers, 2018 UT App 74 (Utah Ct. App. 2018).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(a)(i) — 8 cases
State v. Galli, 967 P.2d 930 (Utah 1998). “Particularly, Galli contends that Judge Brian incorrectly interpreted and applied Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 when he ordered him to pay restitution to his family.”
State v. McBride, 940 P.2d 539 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Tenney, 913 P.2d 750 (Utah Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Schweitzer, 943 P.2d 649 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Stirba, 972 P.2d 918 (Utah Ct. App. 1998).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(a)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Stirba, 972 P.2d 918 (Utah Ct. App. 1998).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(a)(iv) — 1 case
State v. Schweitzer, 943 P.2d 649 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(a)(v) — 1 case
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(a)(vi) — 1 case
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(b) — 5 cases
State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(d)(i) (emphasis added).”
State v. Corbitt, 2003 UT App 417 (Utah Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Depaoli, 835 P.2d 162 (Utah 1992).
State v. Garcia, 866 P.2d 5 (Utah Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Debrok, 2025 UT 40 (Utah 2025).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(b)(i) — 1 case
State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(d)(i) (emphasis added).”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(c) — 2 cases
State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(d)(i) (emphasis added).”
Utah v. Troff (In Re Troff), 329 B.R. 85 (Bankr. D. Utah 2005).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(c)(i) — 1 case
State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(d)(i) (emphasis added).”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(d) — 4 cases
State v. Snyder, 747 P.2d 417 (Utah 1987).
State v. Depaoli, 835 P.2d 162 (Utah 1992).
State v. Becker, 2018 UT App 81 (Utah Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Stayer, 706 P.2d 611 (Utah 1985).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(d)(i) — 5 cases
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
State v. Robertson, 932 P.2d 1219 (Utah 1997). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(d)(i) (emphasis added).”
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
State v. Smith, 2003 UT App 179 (Utah Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Garcia, 866 P.2d 5 (Utah Ct. App. 1993).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(d)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Garcia, 866 P.2d 5 (Utah Ct. App. 1993).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(d)(iii) — 1 case
State v. Schweitzer, 943 P.2d 649 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(4)(e) — 5 cases
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
State v. Weeks, 12 P.3d 110 (Utah Ct. App. 2000). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) & (4) (1999); State v.”
State v. Breeze, 2001 UT App 200 (Utah Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Haga, 954 P.2d 1284 (Utah Ct. App. 1998).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(5) — 7 cases
State v. Egbert, 748 P.2d 558 (Utah 1987). “" [7] Any vagueness to be found in subsection 76-5-405(2), which provides for sentences of five, ten, or fifteen years and which may be for life, is dispelled by the implementing language of Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (5) (Supp. 1983) (amended 1984, 1986 & 1987), which plainly…”
State v. Shickles, 760 P.2d 291 (Utah 1988). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (6)(b) (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Lovell, 758 P.2d 909 (Utah 1988).
State v. Babbell, 770 P.2d 987 (Utah 1989).
State v. Gibbons, 779 P.2d 1133 (Utah 1989).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(5)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Wright, 893 P.2d 1113 (Utah Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Strunk, 846 P.2d 1297 (Utah 1993). “NOTES [1] It does not appear from the record why the prosecution did not seek to have Strunk sentenced under section 76-3-201(6)(c), which mandates the imposition of the longest mandatory sentence for child kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse of a child when "the defendant…”
State v. Elm, 808 P.2d 1097 (Utah 1991).
State v. Russell, 791 P.2d 188 (Utah 1990).
State v. Gibbons, 779 P.2d 1133 (Utah 1989).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(5)(b) — 1 case
State v. Elm, 808 P.2d 1097 (Utah 1991).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(5)(c) — 2 cases
State v. Ramirez, 924 P.2d 366 (Utah Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Gibbons, 779 P.2d 1133 (Utah 1989).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(5)(d) — 3 cases
State v. Shickles, 760 P.2d 291 (Utah 1988). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (6)(b) (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Bell, 754 P.2d 55 (Utah 1988).
State v. Gibbons, 779 P.2d 1133 (Utah 1989).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(6) — 1 case
State v. Burr, 2018 UT 63 (Utah 2018).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(6)(a) — 3 cases
State v. Lopes, 1999 UT 24 (Utah 1999).
State v. Simmons, 5 P.3d 1228 (Utah Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Burr, 2018 UT 63 (Utah 2018).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(6)(a)(i) — 1 case
State v. Wilkerson, 2020 UT App 160 (Utah Ct. App. 2020).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(6)(b) — 5 cases
State v. Shickles, 760 P.2d 291 (Utah 1988). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (6)(b) (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Strunk, 846 P.2d 1297 (Utah 1993). “NOTES [1] It does not appear from the record why the prosecution did not seek to have Strunk sentenced under section 76-3-201(6)(c), which mandates the imposition of the longest mandatory sentence for child kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse of a child when "the defendant…”
State v. Labrum, 925 P.2d 937 (Utah 1996).
State v. Bell, 754 P.2d 55 (Utah 1988).
State v. Gibbons, 779 P.2d 1133 (Utah 1989).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(6)(c) — 2 cases
State v. Strunk, 846 P.2d 1297 (Utah 1993). “NOTES [1] It does not appear from the record why the prosecution did not seek to have Strunk sentenced under section 76-3-201(6)(c), which mandates the imposition of the longest mandatory sentence for child kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse of a child when "the defendant…”
State v. Lopes, 1999 UT 24 (Utah 1999).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(6)(d) — 3 cases
State v. Malaga, 2006 UT App 103 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
State v. Labrum, 925 P.2d 937 (Utah 1996).
State v. Steed, 2017 UT App 6 (Utah Ct. App. 2017).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(7) — 2 cases
State v. Johnston, 2009 UT App 136 (Utah Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Moreno, 2005 UT App 200 (Utah Ct. App. 2005).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(7)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Lebeau, 2014 UT 39 (Utah 2014). “§ 76-3-201(7)(a). Section 76-3-201(7)(e) then directed the court to consider the aggravating and mitigating circumstances recognized by the Utah Sentencing Commission.”
State v. Johnston, 2009 UT App 136 (Utah Ct. App. 2009).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(7)(b) — 2 cases
State v. Labrum, 925 P.2d 937 (Utah 1996).
State v. Garner, 2008 UT App 32 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(7)(c) — 1 case
State v. Garner, 2008 UT App 32 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(7)(e) — 2 cases
State v. Lebeau, 2014 UT 39 (Utah 2014). “§ 76-3-201(7)(a). Section 76-3-201(7)(e) then directed the court to consider the aggravating and mitigating circumstances recognized by the Utah Sentencing Commission.”
State v. Montiel, 2005 UT 48 (Utah 2005).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(8) — 3 cases
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
State v. Shickles, 760 P.2d 291 (Utah 1988). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (6)(b) (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Smith, 2003 UT App 179 (Utah Ct. App. 2003).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(8)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Weeks, 2002 UT 98 (Utah 2002). “" Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (4)(e) (1999) (emphasis added).”
State v. Weeks, 12 P.3d 110 (Utah Ct. App. 2000). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) & (4) (1999); State v.”
State v. Smith, 2003 UT App 179 (Utah Ct. App. 2003).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(8)(c) — 1 case
State v. Weeks, 12 P.3d 110 (Utah Ct. App. 2000). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 (2) & (4) (1999); State v.”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(l)(a)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Bernert, 2004 UT App 321 (Utah Ct. App. 2004).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(l)(b) — 2 cases
State v. Gibson, 2017 UT App 142 (Utah Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Wallace, 100 P.3d 273 (Utah Ct. App. 2004).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(l)(c) — 3 cases
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
State v. McBride, 940 P.2d 539 (Utah Ct. App. 1997).
In Interest of Tw, 2006 UT App 259 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(l)(d) — 2 cases
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
Reeves v. State, 24 So. 3d 549 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009).
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(l)(e)(i) — 1 case
Monson v. Carver, 928 P.2d 1017 (Utah 1996). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201 . Thus, Monson had no accrued right to a sentence that excluded restitution.”
— Utah Code § 76-3-201(l)(e)(ii) — 1 case
In Interest of Tw, 2006 UT App 259 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.