Utah Code

Utah Code § 77-13-1 (2026)

Kinds of pleas

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
There are five kinds of pleas to an indictment or information:
not guilty;
guilty;
no contest;
not guilty by reason of insanity; and
guilty with a mental condition at the time of the offense.
An alternative plea of not guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity may be entered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1987–2017 · leading case: State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935 (Utah Ct. App. 1988).
State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935 (Utah Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 8× “[4] See Utah Code Ann. § 77-13-1 (1988); Utah Code Ann.”
State v. Rettig, 2017 UT 83 (Utah 2017). · cites it 2× “See UTAH CODE§ 77-13-1. Once a guilty plea has been entered, the guilty plea is binding on the guilt phase of litigation.”
State v. Rettig, 2017 UT 83 (Utah 2017). · cites it 2× “See UTAH CODE § 77-13-1. Once a guilty plea has been entered, the guilty plea is binding on the guilt phase of litigation.”
Commonwealth v. Trill, 543 A.2d 1106 (Pa. 1988). · cites it 2× “1986); Utah Code Ann. §§ 77-13-1 , 77-35-11, 77-35-21, 77-35-21.”
State v. Neely, 819 P.2d 249 (N.M. 1991). · cites it 2× “1990); and Utah, see Utah Code Ann. §§ 77-13-1 , -16a-1 to -6 (1990 & Supp.”
State v. DePlonty, 749 P.2d 621 (Utah 1987). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code Ann. § 77-13-1 (Supp.1987). The Act specifically instructs the trial court how such pleas are to be evaluated.”
State v. Rettig, 2017 UT 83 (Utah 2017). · cites it 2× “See UTAH CODE § 77-13-1. Once a guilty plea has been entered, the guilty plea is binding on the guilt phase of litigation.”
Valenzuela-Lozoya v. West Valley City, 2015 UT App 122 (Utah Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “11(e)(8) (noting that a defendant who has entered a guilty plea has only a limited right to appeal); see also Utah Code Ann. § 77-13-1 (2)(c) (LexisNexis 2012) ("Any challenge to a guilty plea not made [by requesting to withdraw the plea before sentencing] shall be pursued under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.