Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in
the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email.
Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps —
claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the
rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it
off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode,
which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live
credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken
office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under
“Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call
904-383-7448.
(a) The Commission shall endeavor through public education to increase awareness of the
importance of full civil and human rights for each inhabitant of this State. The
Commission shall also examine and evaluate generally the effectiveness of this chapter
as well as the existence of practices of discrimination that detract from the enjoyment
of full civil and human rights and shall recommend measures designed to protect those
rights.
(b)(1) The Commission shall have jurisdiction to investigate and enforce complaints of unlawful
discrimination in violation of chapter 139 of this title, discrimination in public
accommodations and rental and sale of real estate. The Commission shall also have
jurisdiction when the party complained against is a State agency in matters for which
the Attorney General would otherwise have jurisdiction under subsection (c) of this
section.
(2) In any case relating to unlawful discrimination or sexual harassment in violation
of 21 V.S.A. § 495 et seq. that the Commission has jurisdiction over pursuant to this subsection, it
shall include a statement setting forth the prohibition against retaliation pursuant
to 21 V.S.A. § 495(a)(8) with any formal complaint that is sent to a respondent.
(c) All complaints of unlawful discrimination in violation of 21 V.S.A. §§ 495 et seq. and 710, the Fair Employment Practices Act and the provisions for workers’ compensation discrimination,
respectively, and of 21 V.S.A. § 471 et seq. shall be referred to the Attorney General’s office for investigation and
enforcement. (Added 1987, No. 234 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; amended 1989, No. 150 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; 2017, No. 183 (Adj. Sess.), § 3.)
Dep't of Corr. v. Human Rights Comm'n, 181 Vt. 225 (Vt. 2006). “9 V.S.A. § 4552(b). Pertinent to this case, it is generally unlawful for any place of public accommodation to discriminate against an individual with a disability.”
Human Rights v. Human Resources (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2ד” 9 V.S.A. § 4552(b). To take DHR’s argument to its logical extreme, neither HRC nor an employee acting in their individual capacity could bring an action against a State agency for discrimination resulting from a term of any collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”), no matter…”
Dep't of Corr. v. Human Rights Comm'n, 181 Vt. 225 (Vt. 2006). “9 V.S.A. § 4552(b). Pertinent to this case, it is generally unlawful for any place of public accommodation to discriminate against an individual with a disability.”
Human Rights v. Human Resources (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4552(b). To take DHR’s argument to its logical extreme, neither HRC nor an employee acting in their individual capacity could bring an action against a State agency for discrimination resulting from a term of any collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”), no matter…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4552(b)(1) — 1 case
Human Rights v. Human Resources (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “” 9 V.S.A. § 4552(b). To take DHR’s argument to its logical extreme, neither HRC nor an employee acting in their individual capacity could bring an action against a State agency for discrimination resulting from a term of any collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”), no matter…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.