Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 37
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 913 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : WETLANDS DETERMINATIONS AND PROTECTION

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 913)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2021 · leading case: In re Champlain Parkway Wetland Conditional Use Determination (Fortieth Burlington, LLC), 202 A.3d 953 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Champlain Parkway Wetland Conditional Use Determination (Fortieth Burlington, LLC), 202 A.3d 953 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 3× “3 The *957 majority of the questions related to the project's impacts on wetland H/I and its compliance with the Vermont Wetland Rules and Vermont wetland statute 10 V.S.A. § 913 (prohibiting certain activities in wetlands and wetland buffer zones).”
In re Costco Stormwater Dishcharge Permit, Costco Final Plat & Site Plan, Costco Act 250 Land Use Permit, Wetlands, Reclassification (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs. LLP, Appellants), 2016 VT 86 (Vt. 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 913(a). Finally, in March 2014, ANR issued an individual wetland permit, authorizing Costco to build and operate a portion of the project, consisting of gas pumps and a parking lot, as well as upgrades to the existing stormwater system, within the buffer zone.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Hugh McGee & Eileen McGee, 2016 VT 90 (Vt. 2016). “” 10 V.S.A. § 913(a). This broad requirement is tempered in two ways.”
ANR v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLP - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). · cites it 13× “§ 1259(a) for the unpermitted discharge of wastes from one of Respondent’s facilities to a tributary of the Dead Creek, and two violations of 10 V.S.A § 913(a) and Vermont Wetlands Rules § 9.”
Champlain Parkway Wetland Determination - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). · cites it 11× “4 Question 9 inquires broadly into the Project’s compliance with 10 V.S.A. § 913, the Vermont Wetland Rules (“VWR”), the Vermont Water Quality Standards (“VWQS”), and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Timothy Persons & Trust A of Timothy Persons, 2013 VT 46 (Vt. 2013). “Rules 12 004 056; see also 10 V.S.A. § 913(a) (“[N]o person shall conduct or allow to be conducted an activity in a significant wetland or buffer zone of a significant wetland except in compliance with a permit, conditional use determination, or order issued by the secretary.”
ANR v. McGee (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “See 10 V.S.A. § 913 (“[N]o person shall conduct or allow to be conducted an activity in a significant wetland or buffer zone .”
Champlain Parkway Wetland CU Determination (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “complies with the Vermont Wetland Statute, 10 V.S.A. § 913?” Champlain Parkway Wetland CUD, No.”
Atwood-Hood PRD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). “3, and mandate that the buffer remain undeveloped, unless such development falls within one of a few narrow 16 See 10 V.S.A. § 913(a) (“Except for allowed uses adopted by the panel by rule, no person shall conduct or allow to be conducted an activity in a significant wetland or…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 913(a) — 8 cases
In re Costco Stormwater Dishcharge Permit, Costco Final Plat & Site Plan, Costco Act 250 Land Use Permit, Wetlands, Reclassification (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs. LLP, Appellants), 2016 VT 86 (Vt. 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 913(a). Finally, in March 2014, ANR issued an individual wetland permit, authorizing Costco to build and operate a portion of the project, consisting of gas pumps and a parking lot, as well as upgrades to the existing stormwater system, within the buffer zone.”
In re Champlain Parkway Wetland Conditional Use Determination (Fortieth Burlington, LLC), 202 A.3d 953 (Vt. 2018). “3 The *957 majority of the questions related to the project's impacts on wetland H/I and its compliance with the Vermont Wetland Rules and Vermont wetland statute 10 V.S.A. § 913 (prohibiting certain activities in wetlands and wetland buffer zones).”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Hugh McGee & Eileen McGee, 2016 VT 90 (Vt. 2016). “” 10 V.S.A. § 913(a). This broad requirement is tempered in two ways.”
ANR v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLP - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “§ 1259(a) for the unpermitted discharge of wastes from one of Respondent’s facilities to a tributary of the Dead Creek, and two violations of 10 V.S.A § 913(a) and Vermont Wetlands Rules § 9.”
Champlain Parkway Wetland Determination - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “4 Question 9 inquires broadly into the Project’s compliance with 10 V.S.A. § 913, the Vermont Wetland Rules (“VWR”), the Vermont Water Quality Standards (“VWQS”), and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 913(b)(2) — 1 case
Champlain Parkway Wetland Determination - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “4 Question 9 inquires broadly into the Project’s compliance with 10 V.S.A. § 913, the Vermont Wetland Rules (“VWR”), the Vermont Water Quality Standards (“VWQS”), and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.