Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2003 (2026)
False tokens described
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 2003)
-
§ 2003. False tokens described
The use of a matured check, or other order for the payment of money, as a means of obtaining from another person money or other property, or a release or discharge of a debt or obligation, or the signature of a person to a written instrument the false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, such as is specified in section 2002 of this title, by a person who knows that the drawer thereof is not entitled to draw for the sum specified therein upon the drawee, is the use of a false token within the meaning of section 2002 of this title, although representation is not made in respect thereto.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1975–1986 · leading case: State v. Foley, 443 A.2d 452 (Vt. 1982).
State v. Foley, 443 A.2d 452 (Vt. 1982). “See 13 V.S.A. § 2003. Third, the offender must actually obtain money or property with a value in excess of $25.”
State v. Allen, 507 A.2d 975 (Vt. 1986). “Such a conclusion, he argues, is compelled by 13 V.S.A. § 2003, which in pertinent part defines “false token” as: The use of a matured check, or other order for the payment of money,- as a means of obtaining from another person money or other property, .”
State v. Zeisner, 340 A.2d 69 (Vt. 1975). “Dated that same day, the checks were matured, and a false token within the definition of 13 V.S.A. § 2003 if such knowledge of lack of entitlement existed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.