Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 65
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2907 (2026)

Repealed. 2005, No. 148 (Adj. Sess.), § 4e.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 2907)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1971–2008 · leading case: State v. Wilkinson, 2005 VT 46, 879 A.2d 445.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wilkinson, 2005 VT 46, 879 A.2d 445. · cites it 4× “Before trial, the State informed the court that Tom had been convicted of perjury, and therefore he was incompetent to testify pursuant to 13 V.S.A. §2907, which provides that “[t]he oath of a person convicted of perjury.”
State v. Polidor, 285 A.2d 770 (Vt. 1971). · cites it 4× “The contention of the defendant is that under 13 V.S.A. § 2907 the testimony of Atkinson could not be received by the court.”
State v. Briggs, 568 A.2d 779 (Vt. 1989). “*535 Casey’s conflicting statements did not render her an incompetent witness, since 13 V.S.A. § 2907 prohibits testimony only by a person actually convicted of perjury.”
State v. Franklin, 2005 VT 90, 883 A.2d 783. “Until the Vermont Legislature amends 13 V.S.A. § 2907 and 12 V.S.A. § 1608, however, we must apply them.”
Wilkinson v. Hofmann, 572 F. Supp. 2d 470 (D. Vt. 2008). · cites it 3× “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit.13, § 2907 (1947)(repealed 2006).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.