Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 85
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERALLY

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 4021)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2018–2026 · leading case: United States v. Trumbull, 114 F.4th 1114 (9th Cir. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Trumbull, 114 F.4th 1114 (9th Cir. 2024). · cites it 3× “1-3 ; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021 ; Wash. Rev.”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 8× “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta, 133 F.4th 852 (9th Cir. 2025). “1-3; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021 ; Wash. Rev.”
United States v. Ibanez, 893 F.3d 1218 (10th Cir. 2018). “02 (8) ; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021 (a) ; City of Los Angeles, Cal.”
United States v. Nahsiem McIntosh, 124 F.4th 199 (3rd Cir. 2024). “10(a)(1); Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021 (e)(1). Colorado is the only state to adopt a 15-round numeric threshold, see Colo.”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 8× “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
Vermont Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Matthew Birmingham, 2020 VT 27 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 2× “13 V.S.A. § 4021 (a), (e). In their complaint, plaintiffs challenge this statute under Chapter I, Article 16 of the Vermont Constitution, which states in part “[t]hat the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State.”
Vermont Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Matthew Birmingham, 2021 VT 11 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 2× “In the above-captioned case, this Court accepted an appeal on report posing the question: Does 13 V.S.A. § 4021 violate Chapter I, Article 16 of the Vermont Constitution? This Court has resolved the same question in a decision issued this day in the case of State v.”
Vt. Fed'n of Sportsmen's Club v. Birmingham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). · cites it 5× “The State has filed a motion to dismiss arguing that Plaintiffs lack standing to attack the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021 and that the ban is constitutional as a matter of law.”
Vermont Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Birmingham (D. Vt. 2024). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs allege that 13 V.S.A. § 4021, which prohibits possession and sale of “large capacity ammunition feeding device[s]” (“large capacity magazines” or “LCMs”), and 13 V.”
Vt. Fed. Sportsmen v. Birmingham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “The case concerns the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A § 4021, which limits the size of the magazines that can be used in firearms.”
Vermont Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Birmingham (D. Vt. 2024). “§ 4019a, which prohibits transfer of a firearm without a background check or expiration of a waiting period, are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021(a) — 4 cases
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
Vt. Fed'n of Sportsmen's Club v. Birmingham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “The State has filed a motion to dismiss arguing that Plaintiffs lack standing to attack the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021 and that the ban is constitutional as a matter of law.”
Vermont Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Birmingham (D. Vt. 2024). “Plaintiffs allege that 13 V.S.A. § 4021, which prohibits possession and sale of “large capacity ammunition feeding device[s]” (“large capacity magazines” or “LCMs”), and 13 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021(b) — 1 case
Vt. Fed'n of Sportsmen's Club v. Birmingham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “The State has filed a motion to dismiss arguing that Plaintiffs lack standing to attack the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021 and that the ban is constitutional as a matter of law.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021(c) — 1 case
Vermont Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Birmingham (D. Vt. 2024). “Plaintiffs allege that 13 V.S.A. § 4021, which prohibits possession and sale of “large capacity ammunition feeding device[s]” (“large capacity magazines” or “LCMs”), and 13 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021(d)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021(d)(1)(A) — 2 cases
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “; John Fogarty; and Samuel Frank, challenged the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021. This opinion addresses arguments raised in that appeal to the extent that they differ from those raised in this case, and we have decided that case in its own docket today in a published…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4021(e)(1) — 1 case
Vt. Fed'n of Sportsmen's Club v. Birmingham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “The State has filed a motion to dismiss arguing that Plaintiffs lack standing to attack the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4021 and that the ban is constitutional as a matter of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.