Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4352

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIONS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4352)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants)
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants) (2021) vt ““[S]ubstantial deference” must be given to “land conservation measures and specific policies contained in a duly adopted regional and municipal plan that has received an affirmative determination of energy compliance under 24 V.S.A. § 4352.” 30 V.S.A. § 248(b)(1)(C).”
In Re Petition of Randolph Davis Solar LLC (Joan Allen and Michael Binder, Appellants) (2025) vt · cites it 3× “Under § 248(b)(1)’s orderly development criterion, the PUC must give due consideration to the “recommendations of the municipal and regional planning commissions . . . municipal legislative bodies, and the land conservation measures contained in the plan of any affected…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4352(c) — 1 case
In Re Petition of Randolph Davis Solar LLC (Joan Allen and Michael Binder, Appellants) (2025) vt “Under § 248(b)(1)’s orderly development criterion, the PUC must give due consideration to the “recommendations of the municipal and regional planning commissions . . . municipal legislative bodies, and the land conservation measures contained in the plan of any affected…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.