Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases, 1981–2010 · leading case:
In Re Handy, 764 A.2d 1226 (Vt. 2000).
In Re Handy, 764 A.2d 1226 (Vt. 2000).
· cites it 2× “[4] Section 4443(d) does not specify whether the "public notice" referred to is the public hearing notice required of the planning commission by 24 V.S.A. § 4403(d) or the public hearing notice required of the selectboard by 24 V.”
Smith v. Town of St. Johnsbury, 554 A.2d 233 (Vt. 1988).
· cites it 2× “24 V.S.A. § 4403. Normally, the planning commission holds a hearing on the proposal and submits it to the legislative body of the municipality in the original or revised form together with a written report on the proposal.”
Kalakowski v. Town of Clarendon, 431 A.2d 478 (Vt. 1981).
· cites it 2× “24 V.S.A. § 4403(a). The commission must hold at least one duly noticed public hearing on the proposal.”
McLaughry v. Town of Norwich, 433 A.2d 319 (Vt. 1981).
“§ 4401, which authorizes the adoption of bylaws, nor 24 V.S.A. § 4403, which relates to the preparation of bylaws and speaks of filing “a copy of the proposed by-law, amendment or repeal for public review” with the town clerk, prohibits such incorporation.”
In Re Cottrell, 614 A.2d 381 (Vt. 1992).
“Pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4403, the Newbury Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposal and submitted it to the selectmen, together with an analysis of the proposal as required by § 4403(c).”
Highland Dev. Co., LLC & JAM Golf, LLC Master Plan (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
“While an advisory committee may be useful in helping a decisionmaker to determine whether a particular project meets a stated standard, see 24 V.S.A. § 4403(6), such a committee cannot be delegated standardless discretion, just as a DRB or a court is precluded from exercising…”
Paynter 2-Lot Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
“624 V.S.A. § 4403, repealed and recodified in substantially the same format at 24 V.”
Appeal of Highlands Dev. Co, LLC & JAM Golf, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005).
“24 V.S.A. § 4403(e) (new § 4441(e)). The City admits that it failed to deliver a copy of the proposed bylaw revisions to DHCA “with proof of receipt, or mail[] by certified mail, return receipt requested.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4403(6) — 1 case
Highland Dev. Co., LLC & JAM Golf, LLC Master Plan (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
“While an advisory committee may be useful in helping a decisionmaker to determine whether a particular project meets a stated standard, see 24 V.S.A. § 4403(6), such a committee cannot be delegated standardless discretion, just as a DRB or a court is precluded from exercising…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4403(a) — 1 case
Kalakowski v. Town of Clarendon, 431 A.2d 478 (Vt. 1981).
“24 V.S.A. § 4403(a). The commission must hold at least one duly noticed public hearing on the proposal.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4403(b) — 1 case
Kalakowski v. Town of Clarendon, 431 A.2d 478 (Vt. 1981).
“24 V.S.A. § 4403(a). The commission must hold at least one duly noticed public hearing on the proposal.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4403(d) — 1 case
In Re Handy, 764 A.2d 1226 (Vt. 2000).
“[4] Section 4443(d) does not specify whether the "public notice" referred to is the public hearing notice required of the planning commission by 24 V.S.A. § 4403(d) or the public hearing notice required of the selectboard by 24 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4403(e) — 1 case
Appeal of Highlands Dev. Co, LLC & JAM Golf, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005).
“24 V.S.A. § 4403(e) (new § 4441(e)). The City admits that it failed to deliver a copy of the proposed bylaw revisions to DHCA “with proof of receipt, or mail[] by certified mail, return receipt requested.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4403(f) — 1 case
Smith v. Town of St. Johnsbury, 554 A.2d 233 (Vt. 1988).
“24 V.S.A. § 4403. Normally, the planning commission holds a hearing on the proposal and submits it to the legislative body of the municipality in the original or revised form together with a written report on the proposal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.