Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 6911 (2026)

Records of abuse, neglect, and exploitation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : REPORTS OF ABUSE OF VULNERABLE ADULTS

(Cite as: 33 V.S.A. § 6911)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1996–2015 · leading case: In re Tinker, 686 A.2d 946 (Vt. 1996).
In re Tinker, 686 A.2d 946 (Vt. 1996). · cites it 3× “* 33 V.S.A. § 6911; see id. § 6913. We nonetheless agree with the Board that, given the purpose of the abuse statute and the registry established by § 6911, the Legislature did not intend to permanently identify and stigmatize a person who engages in abusive conduct, however…”
Czechorowski v. State, 2005 VT 40 (Vt. 2005). “Nor does plaintiff dispute Monahan’s statement that she declined a request for disclosure of information related to the-incident on the ground that it was confidential under 33 V.S.A. § 6911(a). This statute provided, at the time, that information obtained through reports and…”
In re Harwood, 2013 VT 89 (Vt. 2013). “Petitioner’s name was added to the state abuse registry in accordance with 33 V.S.A. § 6911(b). See In re Tinker, 165 Vt.”
In re Harwood, 195 Vt. 7 (Vt. 2013). “Petitioner’s name was added to the state abuse registry in accordance with 33 V.S.A. § 6911(b). See In re Appeal of Tinker , 165 Vt.”
In re Marvin Waldman (Vt. 2015). · cites it 2× “See 33 V.S.A. § 6911(f) (“A person may at any time apply to the Department for expungement of his or her name from the Registry.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 6911(a) — 2 cases
Czechorowski v. State, 2005 VT 40 (Vt. 2005). “Nor does plaintiff dispute Monahan’s statement that she declined a request for disclosure of information related to the-incident on the ground that it was confidential under 33 V.S.A. § 6911(a). This statute provided, at the time, that information obtained through reports and…”
In re Tinker, 686 A.2d 946 (Vt. 1996). “* 33 V.S.A. § 6911; see id. § 6913. We nonetheless agree with the Board that, given the purpose of the abuse statute and the registry established by § 6911, the Legislature did not intend to permanently identify and stigmatize a person who engages in abusive conduct, however…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 6911(b) — 2 cases
In re Harwood, 2013 VT 89 (Vt. 2013). “Petitioner’s name was added to the state abuse registry in accordance with 33 V.S.A. § 6911(b). See In re Tinker, 165 Vt.”
In re Harwood, 195 Vt. 7 (Vt. 2013). “Petitioner’s name was added to the state abuse registry in accordance with 33 V.S.A. § 6911(b). See In re Appeal of Tinker , 165 Vt.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 6911(c)(3) — 1 case
In re Tinker, 686 A.2d 946 (Vt. 1996). “* 33 V.S.A. § 6911; see id. § 6913. We nonetheless agree with the Board that, given the purpose of the abuse statute and the registry established by § 6911, the Legislature did not intend to permanently identify and stigmatize a person who engages in abusive conduct, however…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 6911(f) — 1 case
In re Marvin Waldman (Vt. 2015). “See 33 V.S.A. § 6911(f) (“A person may at any time apply to the Department for expungement of his or her name from the Registry.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.