Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 59.1-196 (2026)
Title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter may be cited as the Virginia Consumer Protection Act of 1977.
1977, c. 635.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 148
cases (32 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: McPike v. Zero-Gravity Holdings, Inc., 280 F. Supp. 3d 800 (E.D. Va. 2017).
McPike v. Zero-Gravity Holdings, Inc., 280 F. Supp. 3d 800 (E.D. Va. 2017). “Armed with this information, plaintiff filed a five-count complaint against SA on May 17, 2017, alleging: (i) that he was fradulently induced to enter into the Agreement by SA’s misrepresentations regarding its relationship with Roscosmos; (ii) that SA violated Virginia’s…”
Rucker v. Sheehy Alexandria, Inc., 228 F. Supp. 2d 711 (E.D. Va. 2002). “Count TV: violations of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act, Va.Code § 59.1-196 et seq. Count V: Breach of Contract Count VI: Fraud Rucker filed a motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Count II and Sheehy filed a cross motion for summary judgment on all counts.”
Schmidt v. Household Fin. Corp., II, 661 S.E.2d 834 (Va. 2008). “The issues on appeal are whether the circuit court erred by sustaining both a demurrer to a claim for rescission of the mortgage loan and a plea in bar of the applicable statutes of limitation as to claims for actual fraud and constructive fraud, along with violations of the…”
Abi-Najm v. Concord Condo., LLC, 699 S.E.2d 483 (Va. 2010). “In this appeal from the dismissal of an action alleging breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, and violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act, Code §§ 59.1-196 et seq. ("VCPA" or "the Act"), we consider whether the trial court erred when it sustained the demurrers…”
Thousand Oaks Barrel Co. v. Deep South Barrels LLC, 241 F. Supp. 3d 708 (E.D. Va. 2017). “See Va. Code § 59.1-196 et seq. Plaintiff states in its brief that the inclusion of this claim was an error and that it is not asserting a VCPA claim against Deep South Barrels in this action.”
Nahigian v. Juno Loudoun, LLC, 684 F. Supp. 2d 731 (E.D. Va. 2010). “) The Virginia Consumer Protection Act of 1977 (VCPA), Va.Code § 59.1-196 et seq., makes it unlawful for a supplier to misrepresent its “goods or services as those of another,” Id.”
Enomoto v. Space Adventures, Ltd., 624 F. Supp. 2d 443 (E.D. Va. 2009). “Virginia Consumer Protection Act (Count V) The Virginia Consumer Protection Act of 1977 (VCPA), Va.Code Ann. § 59.1-196 et seq., makes it unlawful for a supplier to misrepresent its “goods or services as those of another,” id.”
In re Niaspan Antitrust Litig., 42 F. Supp. 3d 735 (E.D. Pa. 2014). “Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Virginia Defendants argue that the consumer-protection laws of Minnesota, see Minn.”
Holmes v. LG Marion Corp., 521 S.E.2d 528 (Va. 1999). “In this appeal, Teronnie Holmes challenges the amount of the damage and attorneys' fee awards entered in his favor against LG Marion Corporation (LG Marion) for a willful violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA), Code §§ 59.1-196 through -207. Holmes also asserts…”
Kaltman v. All Am. Pest Control, Inc., 706 S.E.2d 864 (Va. 2011). “2d 483, 485 (2010), purchasers of condominiums brought suit against the seller for breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, and violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act ("VCPA"), Code § 59.1-196 et seq., after they discovered that the condominiums they purchased did…”
Lambert v. Downtown Garage, Inc., 553 S.E.2d 714 (Va. 2001). “In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in granting a motion to strike the plaintiff’s evidence on his claims for common law fraud and violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act, Code §§ 59.1-196 through -207, arising from the purchase of a used car.”
H.D. Oliver Funeral Apts., Inc. v. Dignity Funeral Servs., Inc., 964 F. Supp. 1033 (E.D. Va. 1997). “§ 1125 (a) (Count I), the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA), Va. Code § 59.1-196 et seq. (Count II), and for common law defamation (Count III), all growing out of a newspaper advertisement placed by the defendants.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.