Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 18.71.019 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The Uniform Disciplinary Act, chapter 18.130 RCW, governs unlicensed practice and the issuance and denial of licenses and discipline of licensees under this chapter. When a panel of the commission revokes a license, the respondent may request review of the revocation order of the panel by the remaining members of the commission not involved in the initial investigation. The respondent's request for review must be filed within twenty days of the effective date of the order revoking the respondent's license. The review shall be scheduled for hearing by the remaining members of the commission not involved in the initial investigation within sixty days. The commission shall adopt rules establishing review procedures.
Notes:
Severability—1987 c 150: See RCW 18.122.901.
Severability—1986 c 259: See note following RCW 18.130.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1987–2008 · leading case: Nguyen v. State Health Med. Quality Assur., 29 P.3d 689 (Wash. 2001).
Nguyen v. State Health Med. Quality Assur., 29 P.3d 689 (Wash. 2001). “RCW 18.71.019. The Act, in turn, adopts the procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.”
Nguyen v. Dep't of Health, 144 Wash. 2d 516 (Wash. 2001). “RCW 18.71.019. The Act, in turn, adopts the procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.”
Yow v. Dep't of Health Unlicensed Practice Prog., 199 P.3d 417 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “190; RCW 18.71.019. Clerk’s Papers at 93-95. Clerk’s Papers at 96-101.”
Morelli v. Ehsan, 737 P.2d 1030 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987). “010, ,040(2)(b)(vii); RCW 18.71.019. The act proscribes unlicensed practice, defined as: "Practicing a profession or operating a business identified in RCW 18.”
Washington State Dept. of Health v. Yow, 199 P.3d 417 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “190; RCW 18.71.019. [32] Clerk's Papers at 93-95.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.