Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 26.16.205 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The expenses of the family and the education of the children, including stepchildren, are chargeable upon the property of both spouses or both domestic partners, or either of them, and they may be sued jointly or separately. When a petition for dissolution of marriage or state registered domestic partnership or a petition for legal separation is filed, the court may, upon motion of the stepparent, terminate the obligation to support the stepchildren. The obligation to support stepchildren shall cease upon the entry of a decree of dissolution, decree of legal separation, or death.
[ 2008 c 6 s 618; 1990 1st ex.s. c 2 s 13; 1969 ex.s. c 207 s 1; Code 1881 s 2407; RRS s 6906. Formerly RCW 26.20.010.]
Notes:
Effective dates—Severability—1990 1st ex.s. c 2: See notes following RCW 26.09.100.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases, 1961–2020 · leading case: Harmon v. Dept. of Soc. & Health Serv., 951 P.2d 770 (Wash. 1998).
Harmon v. Dept. of Soc. & Health Serv., 951 P.2d 770 (Wash. 1998). “205 is not a self-contained and autonomous child support statute.”
Harmon v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 134 Wash. 2d 523 (Wash. 1998). “In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the family expense statute, RCW 26.16.205, imposes a child support obligation on a stepparent which is equal to that of the child’s mother and father and which continues after the child leaves the family home.”
Van Dyke v. Thompson, 630 P.2d 420 (Wash. 1981). “Three questions are presented: (1) The applicability of RCW 26.16.205 to a noncustodial stepparent; (2) whether the holding of Fisch v.”
Sunkidd Venture, Inc. v. Snyder-Entel, 941 P.2d 16 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “Sunkidd contends the lease extension, signed while the married couple was living in the apartment, was a community obligation.”
Jennifer J. Zacapu, V Andres Zacapu-Oliver, 368 P.3d 242 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “The Court FINDS a deviation is appropriate in this case because Respondent has a duty of support to his step-children pursuant to RCW 26.16.205. The Court considered the parties!’] financial declarations and further FINDS that if a deviation is not granted there will be…”
Klossner v. San Juan Cnty., 605 P.2d 330 (Wash. 1980). “RCW 26.16.205. Finally, the industrial insurance laws, while providing some benefits to stepchildren and stepparents, also set dependency and other limits on those benefits.”
Dewey v. Dewey, 886 P.2d 623 (Alaska 1994). “, Wash. Rev. Code § 26.16.205 (West 1986 and Supp.”
Zellmer v. Zellmer, 188 P.3d 497 (Wash. 2008). “, the Court of Appeals held a stepparent who is obligated to financially support a stepchild under the family support statute, RCW 26.16.205, is shielded by parental immunity from liability for negligent supervision of the child.”
Zellmer v. Zellmer, 164 Wash. 2d 147 (Wash. 2008). “, the Court of Appeals held a stepparent who is obligated to financially support a stepchild under the family support statute, RCW 26.16.205, is shielded by parental immunity from liability for negligent supervision of the child.”
In Re the Marriage of Boisen, 943 P.2d 682 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “[3] See RCW 26.16.205. [4] Report of Proceedings at 58.”
State v. Clark, 563 P.2d 1253 (Wash. 1977). “RCW 26.16.205 provides: The expenses of the family and the education of the children, including stepchildren, are chargeable upon the property of both husband and wife, or either of them, and in relation thereto they may be sued jointly or separately: Provided, That with regard…”
Ducote v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 222 P.3d 785 (Wash. 2009). “Stepparents” are not defined in the chapters governing dependency proceedings or investigations of child abuse; rather, they are defined in the context of support for dependent children: “ ‘Stepparent’ means the present spouse of the person who is either the mother, father, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.