Wash. Rev. Code » Title 6 · Chapter 6.23
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.060 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If no redemption is made within the redemption period prescribed by RCW 6.23.020 or within any extension of that period under any other provision of this chapter, the purchaser is entitled to a sheriff's deed; or, if so redeemed, whenever sixty days have elapsed and no other redemption has been made or notice given operating to extend the period for re-redemption, and the time for redemption by the judgment debtor has expired, the last redemptioner is entitled to receive a sheriff's deed as provided in RCW 6.21.120.
[ 1987 c 442 s 706; 1961 c 196 s 2; 1899 c 53 s 10; RRS s 597. Prior: 1897 c 50 s 16. Formerly RCW 6.24.160.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: Performance Constr., App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-app, 380 P.3d 618 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Performance Constr., App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-app, 380 P.3d 618 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “RCW 6.23.060. But, of relevance to this case, there is an exception to this requirement—that entitles a third party to the property—outlined in RCW 6.”
Millay v. Cam, 928 P.2d 463 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 3× “And RCW 6.23.060 clearly states that the sheriff had no discretion to refuse Millay a deed if Millay had tendered payment.”
Performance Constr., Llc v. Change Investments & Cascades Concepts (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “at 410 ; RCW 6.23.060. Validity of the Sheriff's Deed to Chang and Cascade We first address the validity of the July 2016 sheriffs deed issued to Chang and Cascade.”
Pnc Bank Na v. Jerry Reeves (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “See Millay v. Cam, 135 Wn.2d 193, 205 , 955 P.2d 791 (1998).”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., V. John E. Erickson & Shelley A. Erickson (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 6.23.060; Performance, 195 Wn. App. at 418 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.