Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.950 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be applied and construed so as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this chapter among states enacting it.
[1989 c 43 s 1-110.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2001–2014 · leading case: Marina Cove Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Isabella Estates, 34 P.3d 870 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001).
Marina Cove Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Isabella Estates, 34 P.3d 870 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “29 Because RCW 64.34.950 requires that we apply and construe the WCA to effect that purpose and because the WCA substantially conforms to the Uniform Condominium Act (UCA), we look to the UCA’s Official Comment in determining the intent of the Legislature.”
Kelsey Lane Homeowners Ass'n v. Kelsey Lane Co., Inc., 103 P.3d 1256 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “3d 870 (2001) (citing RCW 64.34.950). [39] See RCW 64.34.443, 64.”
Filmore LLLP v. Unit Owners Ass'n, 183 Wash. App. 328 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “”); Washington Condominium Act Official Comments to RCW 64.34.950 cmt., in 2 Senate Journal, 51st Leg.”
Ass'n v. Isabella Estates, 34 P.3d 870 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “[29] Because RCW 64.34.950 requires that we apply and construe the WCA to effect that purpose and because the WCA substantially conforms to the Uniform Condominium Act, we look to the UCA's Official Comment in determining the intent of the Legislature.”
Kelsey Lane Homeowners Ass'n v. Kelsey Lane Co., 125 Wash. App. 227 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “3d 870 (2001) (citing RCW 64.34.950). See RCW 64.34.443, .445. Whatcom County v.”
Filmore, Lllp, Res. v. Unit Owners Ass'n Of Centre Pointe Condo. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “"); Washington Condominium Act Official Comments to RCW 64.34.950 ("This Act should be construed in accordance with its underlying purpose of making uniform the law with respect to condominiums, as well as the purposes stated in the Prefatory Note of simplifying, clarifying, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.