Wash. Rev. Code » Title 71 · Chapter 71.06
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 71.06.050 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon completion of said observation period, the superintendent of the state hospital shall return the defendant to the court, together with a written report of his or her findings as to whether or not the defendant is a sexual psychopath and the facts upon which his or her opinion is based.
[ 2012 c 117 s 432; 1959 c 25 s 71.06.050. Prior: 1951 c 223 s 6.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1975–1996 · leading case: State v. Huntzinger, 594 P.2d 917 (Wash. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Huntzinger, 594 P.2d 917 (Wash. 1979). · cites it 2× “RCW 71.06.050. The statutory section at the heart of the instant challenge is RCW 71.”
State v. King, 925 P.2d 606 (Wash. 1996). “Upon completion of the observation period used to determine whether a defendant is a sexual psychopath, the superintendent of the state hospital "shall return the defendant to the court, together with a written report of his findings as to whether or not the defendant is a…”
State v. King, 925 P.2d 606 (Wash. 1996). “" RCW 71.06.050 (emphasis added). RCW 71.06 clearly contemplates the use of treatment disclosures by the trial court in evaluating a defendant's amenability to treatment.”
State v. Monta, 541 P.2d 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 1975). “That in accordance with RCW 71.06.050 Western State Hospital, on February 21, 1973, reported to Judge Bradford that the defendant was not a sexual psychopath, was not amenable to treatment, would not benefit from further hospitalization, should not be returned for treatment and…”
State v. Huntzinger, 578 P.2d 85 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978). “" RCW 71.06.050. " (2) ... No person convicted of rape in the first degree shall be granted a deferred or suspended sentence except for the purpose of commitment to an inpatient treatment facility; Provided, That every person convicted of rape in the first degree shall be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.