Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 134 — MISCELLANEOUS TRADE REGULATIONS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 134.06 (2026)

Bonus to chauffeurs for purchases, forbidden

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
134.06134.06 Bonus to chauffeurs for purchases, forbidden. It shall be unlawful for any chauffeur, driver or other person having the care of a motor vehicle for the owner to receive or take directly or indirectly without the written consent of such owner any bonus, discount or other consideration for supplies, or parts furnished or purchased for such motor vehicle or upon any work or labor done thereon by others or on the purchase of any motor vehicle for the chauffeur’s, driver’s or other person’s employer and no person furnishing such supplies or parts, work or labor or selling any motor vehicle shall give or offer any such chauffeur or other person having the care of a motor vehicle for the owner thereof, directly or indirectly without such owner’s written consent, any bonus, discount or other consideration thereon. Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not exceeding $25.
134.06 HistoryHistory: 1993 a. 482.
Down
Up
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Code § 134.06(3) prohibits using standard forms to place additional conditions on the return of security deposits, the 23 Nos.”
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Code § 134.06(3) prohibits using standard forms to place additional conditions on the return of security deposits, the 23 Nos.”
Hoke v. Johnson (E.D. Wis. 2022). · cites it 4× “Code ATCP § 134.06— changes any right or duty arising under Chapter 704.”
Clint Heiman v. Chris Roe (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “CODE § 134.06(4)(a) requires, “[i]f any portion of a security deposit is withheld … the landlord shall … deliver … a written statement accounting for all amounts withheld.”
Hoke v. Johnson (E.D. Wis. 2023). · cites it 3× “Code ATCP §§ 134.06 , 134.07, and 134.09(5); as well as for breach of contract, negligence, invasion of privacy,1 and nuisance.”
Carl Wilson v. Leonard Reed (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “CODE ATCP § 134.06], it is required under the plain unambiguous language of [WIS.”
White v. Schwans Consum. Brands Inc (E.D. Wis. 2024). “Code ATCP § 134.06 governing security deposits) falls within the ambit of Section 100.”
— Wis. Stat. § 134.06(3) — 2 cases
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Code § 134.06(3) prohibits using standard forms to place additional conditions on the return of security deposits, the 23 Nos.”
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Code § 134.06(3) prohibits using standard forms to place additional conditions on the return of security deposits, the 23 Nos.”
— Wis. Stat. § 134.06(4)(a) — 1 case
Clint Heiman v. Chris Roe (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “CODE § 134.06(4)(a) requires, “[i]f any portion of a security deposit is withheld … the landlord shall … deliver … a written statement accounting for all amounts withheld.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.