Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 706.11 (2026)
Priority of certain mortgages, trust funds
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
706.11(1)(1) Except as provided in sub. (4), when any of the following mortgages has been duly recorded, it shall have priority over all liens upon the mortgaged premises and the buildings and improvements thereon, except tax and special assessment liens filed after the recording of such mortgage and except liens under ss. 292.31 (8) (i) and 292.81:
706.11(1)(a)(a) Any mortgage executed to a federal savings and loan association or state or federal savings bank.
706.11(1)(b)(b) Any mortgage executed to the department of veterans affairs under s. 45.352, 1971 stats.
706.11(1)(c)1.1. The United States, this state or a county, city, village or town in this state, or an agency, department or other formally constituted subunit of any of the foregoing.
706.11(1)(c)2.2. The Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority created under ch. 231, the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority created under ch. 234, or any other authority created by state law.
706.11(1)(d)(d) Any mortgage executed to a state or national bank or to a state or federally chartered credit union.
706.11(1)(e)(e) Any mortgage executed under s. 66.1103 to a trustee, as defined in s. 66.1103 (2) (n).
706.11(1)(i)(i) Any mortgage executed to an institution chartered by the federal farm credit administration under 12 USC 2002 (a) that is part of the federal farm credit system created under 12 USC 2001 to 2279cc.
706.11(1m)(a)1.1. “Commitment” means an agreement under which a mortgagee agrees to advance to the mortgagor or another person funds that will be secured by the mortgage.
706.11(1m)(a)2.2. “Construction mortgage” means a mortgage that secures an obligation incurred for the construction of an improvement on land, including the acquisition cost of the land.
706.11(1m)(b)(b) An advance of funds, including accrued but unpaid interest on the advance, that is secured by a duly recorded mortgage specified in sub. (1) (a) to (d) or (f) to (i) and that is made after the mortgage has been recorded has the same priority as the mortgage if the advance is made before the mortgagee has actual knowledge of an intervening lien or, regardless of when the advance is made, if any of the following applies:
706.11(1m)(b)1.1. The advance is made under a commitment that is entered into before the mortgagee has actual knowledge of an intervening lien, regardless of whether the advance was made after a default or other event outside of the mortgagee’s control relieved the mortgagee of the obligation to advance funds under the commitment.
706.11(1m)(b)2.2. The advance is made for the reasonable protection of the mortgagee’s interest, including for the payment of real property taxes, property insurance or assessments or other maintenance charges imposed under a condominium declaration or a restrictive covenant.
706.11(1m)(b)3.3. The mortgage is a construction mortgage that clearly states on the first page of the mortgage that it is a construction mortgage and the advance is made to enable completion of the contemplated improvement on the mortgaged premises.
706.11(2)(2) State savings and loan associations shall have the priorities specified under s. 215.21 (4).
706.11(3)(3) The proceeds of any such mortgage referred to in this section shall, when paid out by a state savings bank, federal savings bank, state savings and loan association or federal savings and loan association, or of any other mortgage from any other source and received by the owner of the premises or by any contractor or subcontractor performing the work and labor, forthwith constitute a trust fund only in the hands of such owner, contractor or subcontractor for the payment proportionally of all claims due and to become due or owing from such contractor or subcontractor for lienable labor and materials until all such claims have been paid, and shall not be a trust fund in the hands of any other person. This section shall not create a civil cause of action against any person other than such owner, contractor or subcontractor. The use of any of such moneys by any owner, contractor or subcontractor for any other purpose until all claims, except those which are the subject of a bona fide dispute, have been paid in full, or proportionally in cases of a deficiency, shall constitute theft by such owner, contractor or subcontractor of any moneys so misappropriated. The district attorney of the county where the premises are situated shall on the complaint of any aggrieved party prosecute such owner, contractor or subcontractor misappropriating such moneys for such theft.
706.11(4)(4) Subsection (1) does not apply to a 2nd mortgage assigned to or executed to the department of veterans affairs under s. 45.80 (4) (a) 1., 1989 stats., or s. 45.37 (3), 2017 stats.
706.11 HistoryHistory: 1971 c. 164; 1973 c. 208; 1975 c. 358, 409; 1979 c. 110 s. 60 (12); 1989 a. 231; 1991 a. 39, 221; 1993 a. 453; 1995 a. 27, 227; 1997 a. 27, 44; 1999 a. 150 s. 672; 2001 a. 104; 2007 a. 96; 2019 a. 9, 102.
706.11 AnnotationThe word “contractor” in sub. (3) includes an owner who acts as his own general contractor, and he can be held liable for conversion. Paulsen Lumber, Inc. v. Meyer, 47 Wis. 2d 621, 177 N.W.2d 884 (1970).
706.11 Annotation“Filed after the recording of such mortgage” in sub. (1) modifies “all liens.” Marine Bank Appleton v. Hietpas, Inc., 149 Wis. 2d 587, 439 N.W.2d 604 (Ct. App. 1989).
706.11 Annotation“Lien” in this section does not include a lease. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis. 2d 575, 457 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1990).
706.11 AnnotationSub. (1) (d) applies to all state banks, not just Wisconsin chartered state banks. To hold otherwise would discourage banks chartered in states other than Wisconsin from lending money to investors hoping to invest in Wisconsin projects and likely trigger the cost of capital for Wisconsin projects to rise. Lowell Management Services, Inc. v. Geneva National PQC, LLC, 2009 WI App 149, 321 Wis. 2d 589, 774 N.W.2d 811, 08-2533.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate Bank, 2006 WI 69 (Wis. 2006).
Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate Bank, 2006 WI 69 (Wis. 2006). “01 (4) (2003-04) [1] and Wis. Stat. § 706.11 . And finally, while we do not conclude that Hoida has overcome McDonald Title's prima facie showing that it did not breach the duty of ordinary care under the circumstances, if we were to do so, Hoida's *22 negligence claim would be…”
Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 457 N.W.2d 514 (Wis. Ct. App. 1990). “Winter argues that the trial court erred when it concluded that sec. 706.11, Stats., establishes priority of a subsequent mortgage over a lease as a matter of law.”
Hoida, Inc. v. M&i Midstate Bank, 2004 WI App 191 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “6 This is because Wis. Stat. § 706.11 (lni)(b) establishes that a draw upon a mortgage has priority status like the mortgage itself, unless prior to the payment of the draw "the mortgagee has actual knowledge of an intervening lien.”
Colonial Bank v. Marine Bank, N.A., 448 N.W.2d 659 (Wis. 1989). “Colonial argues that sec. 706.11(1), Stats., compels a contrary result.”
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Section (f) describes certain secured claims and encompasses mortgages under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 , which grants priority to mortgages "executed to a state or national bank.”
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Williams, 2007 WI App 229 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “5 Watson concedes that Cambridge's mortgage had priority over her lien, see Wis. Stat. § 706.11 , but argues that because she paid money to Williams prior to Cambridge's mortgage, equity favors her.”
Marine Bank Appleton v. Hietpas, Inc., 439 N.W.2d 604 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “Although we accept Meyer’s premise that the mortgage priority statute, sec. 706.11(1), Stats., is ambiguous, we reject its interpretation of the statute and other assertions of error and affirm the judgment.”
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Section (f) describes certain secured claims and encompasses mortgages under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 , which grants priority to mortgages "executed to a state or national bank.”
Lowell Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. Geneva Nat'l PQC, LLC, 2009 WI App 149 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “However, there is an exception under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 (1), which states in relevant part: 706.”
Wolohan Lumber Co. v. Pacocha (In re Pacocha), 9 B.R. 531 (W.D. Wis. 1980). “02(5) and § 706.11(3). 4. That defendants contend that said debts are dischargeable under the Bankruptcy Act and that the Wisconsin Statutes do not pre-empt the bankruptcy law and its definitions contained therein.”
SJ Props. Suites v. Specialty Fin. Grp., LLC, 864 F. Supp. 2d 776 (E.D. Wis. 2012). “) (the “315 action”), SFG alleged that it is a “mortgage banker” under Wisconsin Statutes §§ 706.11(1)(f) and 224.71(3). (See id. at ¶ 41 (citing the 315 action Compl.”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Buboltz, 927 N.W.2d 160 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “Based on our holding above, we need not address these arguments.”
— Wis. Stat. § 706.11(1) — 6 cases
Colonial Bank v. Marine Bank, N.A., 448 N.W.2d 659 (Wis. 1989). “Colonial argues that sec. 706.11(1), Stats., compels a contrary result.”
Hoida, Inc. v. M&i Midstate Bank, 2004 WI App 191 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “6 This is because Wis. Stat. § 706.11 (lni)(b) establishes that a draw upon a mortgage has priority status like the mortgage itself, unless prior to the payment of the draw "the mortgagee has actual knowledge of an intervening lien.”
Marine Bank Appleton v. Hietpas, Inc., 439 N.W.2d 604 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “Although we accept Meyer’s premise that the mortgage priority statute, sec. 706.11(1), Stats., is ambiguous, we reject its interpretation of the statute and other assertions of error and affirm the judgment.”
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Section (f) describes certain secured claims and encompasses mortgages under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 , which grants priority to mortgages "executed to a state or national bank.”
Marilyn Casanova v. Michael S. Polsky, Esq., 2023 WI 19 (Wis. 2023). “Section (f) describes certain secured claims and encompasses mortgages under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 , which grants priority to mortgages "executed to a state or national bank.”
— Wis. Stat. § 706.11(1)(f) — 1 case
SJ Props. Suites v. Specialty Fin. Grp., LLC, 864 F. Supp. 2d 776 (E.D. Wis. 2012). “) (the “315 action”), SFG alleged that it is a “mortgage banker” under Wisconsin Statutes §§ 706.11(1)(f) and 224.71(3). (See id. at ¶ 41 (citing the 315 action Compl.”
— Wis. Stat. § 706.11(3) — 1 case
Wolohan Lumber Co. v. Pacocha (In re Pacocha), 9 B.R. 531 (W.D. Wis. 1980). “02(5) and § 706.11(3). 4. That defendants contend that said debts are dischargeable under the Bankruptcy Act and that the Wisconsin Statutes do not pre-empt the bankruptcy law and its definitions contained therein.”
— Wis. Stat. § 706.11(l)(c) — 1 case
Lowell Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. Geneva Nat'l PQC, LLC, 2009 WI App 149 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “However, there is an exception under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 (1), which states in relevant part: 706.”
— Wis. Stat. § 706.11(l)(d) — 1 case
Lowell Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. Geneva Nat'l PQC, LLC, 2009 WI App 149 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “However, there is an exception under Wis. Stat. § 706.11 (1), which states in relevant part: 706.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.