Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 4.10 (2026)

Tenth assembly district

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
4.104.10Tenth assembly district. All of the following territory in Milwaukee County constitutes the 10th assembly district:
4.10(1)(1)The village of Shorewood.
4.10(2)(2)The city of Glendale.
4.10(3)(3)That part of the city of Milwaukee comprising U.S. census tract 2300, blocks 1006, 1011, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 3006, 3007, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, and 3014; and tract 2400, blocks 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2009; and tract 4100, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1009, 1010, 1011, and 1012; and tract 4200, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, and 4013; and tract 4300, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 5000, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009, 6000, 6001, 6002, 6003, 6004, 6005, 6006, 6007, 6008, 6009, and 6010; and tract 4400, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, and 3018; and tract 4500, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, and 3007; and tract 4600, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, and 4011; and tract 6600, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, and 3016; and tract 6700, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011; and tract 6800, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, and 4006; and tract 6900, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, and 3012; and tract 7000, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, and 4012; and tract 7100, blocks 1000, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011; and tract 7200, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013; and tract 8100, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, and 1006; and tract 8500, blocks 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, and 1008; and tract 8600, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, and 1003; and tract 60200, block 1043; and tract 185700, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1008, 1009, 1013, and 1014.
4.10 HistoryHistory: 2023 a. 94.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Weber v. Town of Saukville, 562 N.W.2d 412 (Wis. 1997).
Weber v. Town of Saukville, 562 N.W.2d 412 (Wis. 1997). · cites it 22× “Zoning Ordinance § 4.10. ¶ 17. The court of appeals approached the issue by inquiring "whether the terms 'excavating,' 'stripping' and 'leveling' include blasting and crushing.”
State v. Hubbard, 2008 WI 92 (Wis. 2008). · cites it 2× “, Substantive Criminal Law § 4.10(f), at 560 (1986). Under the Model Penal Code, intoxication that is not self-induced is an affirmative defense when it renders the actor incapable of appreciating the criminality of his or her conduct.”
Ricardo M. Garza v. Am. Transmission Co., 2017 WI 35 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 2× “Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes § 4.10 (Am. Law Inst. 2000) (emphasis added).”
State v. Avery, 2011 WI App 124 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 4.10(d) at 767 (2004). That said, a search conducted pursuant to a lawful warrant may last as long, and be as thorough, as reasonably necessary to fully execute the warrant.”
State v. Andrews, 549 N.W.2d 210 (Wis. 1996). “LaFave, 2 Search and Seizure § 4.10(b) for the proposition that police may search even known personal effects of a visitor if they reasonably believe the visitor "had an opportunity to conceal contraband in his personal belongings immediately prior to or during the execution of…”
State v. Gardner, 601 N.W.2d 670 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, Substantive Criminal Law § 4.10(f), at 560 (1986) ("Yet another instance of involuntary intoxication is when the substance was taken pursuant to medical advice.”
Saddle Ridge v. Bd. for Town of Pac., 2010 WI 47 (Wis. 2010). “4, § 4.10. 6 The three condominiums are Saddle Ridge Estates Condominium, The Forest at Swan Lake Village Condominium, and Saddle Ridge Condominium.”
Foskett v. Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., 501 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (W.D. Wis. 2007). · cites it 3× “Black Wolf cites two provisions of the purchase agreement, § 4.10(b) and § 10.5, as consistent with its interpretation.”
Disc. Fabric House of Racine, Inc. v. Wisconsin Tel. Co., 334 N.W.2d 922 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “Posner, Economic Analysis of Law § 4.10 (2d ed. 1977). [2] Kessler, Contracts of Adhesion — Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract, 43 Colum.”
Campana v. City of Greenfield, 164 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (E.D. Wis. 2001). “An employee is a member of the classified service if she was a department head at the time the Code was modified, March 3, 1998. Id. Classified service members with permanent status can only be removed according to the Code’s procedures.”
Weber v. Town of Saukville, 541 N.W.2d 221 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “In § 4.10, "MINERAL EXTRACTION OPERATIONS" is listed as one of the regulated uses.”
Arvo Eilau v. Dennis Roff (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “: SERVITUDES § 4.10(d) (AM. L. INST. 2000). If the drafters of the Easement wanted to specify a permitted mode of transportation that differed from the general rule, they could have done so.”
Wis. Stat. § 4.10(b): 2 cases
State v. Andrews, 549 N.W.2d 210 (Wis. 1996). “LaFave, 2 Search and Seizure § 4.10(b) for the proposition that police may search even known personal effects of a visitor if they reasonably believe the visitor "had an opportunity to conceal contraband in his personal belongings immediately prior to or during the execution of…”
Foskett v. Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., 501 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (W.D. Wis. 2007). “Black Wolf cites two provisions of the purchase agreement, § 4.10(b) and § 10.5, as consistent with its interpretation.”
Wis. Stat. § 4.10(d): 2 cases
State v. Avery, 2011 WI App 124 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 4.10(d) at 767 (2004). That said, a search conducted pursuant to a lawful warrant may last as long, and be as thorough, as reasonably necessary to fully execute the warrant.”
Arvo Eilau v. Dennis Roff (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “: SERVITUDES § 4.10(d) (AM. L. INST. 2000). If the drafters of the Easement wanted to specify a permitted mode of transportation that differed from the general rule, they could have done so.”
Wis. Stat. § 4.10(f): 2 cases
State v. Hubbard, 2008 WI 92 (Wis. 2008). “, Substantive Criminal Law § 4.10(f), at 560 (1986). Under the Model Penal Code, intoxication that is not self-induced is an affirmative defense when it renders the actor incapable of appreciating the criminality of his or her conduct.”
State v. Gardner, 601 N.W.2d 670 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, Substantive Criminal Law § 4.10(f), at 560 (1986) ("Yet another instance of involuntary intoxication is when the substance was taken pursuant to medical advice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.