Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 4.11 (2026)

Eleventh assembly district

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

4.114.11 Eleventh assembly district. All of the following territory in Milwaukee County constitutes the 11th assembly district: that part of the city of Milwaukee comprising U.S. census tract 102, blocks 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, and 2029; and tract 304, blocks 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2017, and 2020; and tract 600, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 5000, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, and 5005; and tract 700, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, and 3006; and tract 800, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, and 3012; and tract 900, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012; and tract 1000, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, and 3016; and tract 1100, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, and 3008; and tract 1200, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, and 3008; and tract 1300, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, and 4010; and tract 1400, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, and 1006; and tract 1600, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2001, and 2002; and tract 1700, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008; and tract 1800, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, and 3011; and tract 1900, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, and 4008; and tract 2000, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, and 3010; and tract 2100, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, and 3007; and tract 2200, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, and 1029; and tract 2300, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2009, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3008, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 5000, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005, and 5006; and tract 2400, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, and 3016; and tract 2500, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, and 3010; and tract 2800, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015; and tract 2900, blocks 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007; and tract 3000, blocks 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3011, 3012, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, and 4022.

4.11 HistoryHistory: 2023 a. 94.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 13 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Grygiel v. Monches Fish & Game Club, Inc., 2010 WI 93 (Wis. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Grygiel v. Monches Fish & Game Club, Inc., 2010 WI 93 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 4× “: Servitudes § 4.11, at 619 (2000)). 8 Sicchio v. Alvey, 10 Wis.”

Gojmerac v. Mahn, 2002 WI App 22 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “2d 920 (1952); see also Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes § 4.11 at 619 (2000) . ¶ 23. Additionally, the dominant estate cannot be enlarged.”

State v. Black, 526 N.W.2d 132 (Wis. 1994). · cites it 4× “[11] The Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual (1993-1994), as the title suggests, provides guidance in the form of rules and definitions to be used by attorneys employed by the Legislative Reference Bureau in drafting legislation.”

Johnson Controls, Inc. v. London Mkt., 2010 WI 52 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 2× “Windt, Insurance Claims & Disputes § 4.11 (5th ed. 2007) ("Most courts have held that an excess insurer that has a duty to defend is not obligated to provide a defense if the primary insurer is so obligated.”

Lisowski v. Hastings Mut. Ins., 2009 WI 11 (Wis. 2009). · cites it 2× “Wisconsin Insurance Law, supra, § 4.11. The named insured and any relatives who reside in the named insured's household are Class I insureds.”

Jeanine B. Ex Rel. Blondis v. Thompson, 877 F. Supp. 1268 (E.D. Wis. 1995). “Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 4.11, at 291 (2d ed. 1985); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules, 1966 Amendments, 39 F.”

Campana v. City of Greenfield, 164 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (E.D. Wis. 2001). “Classified service members with permanent status can only be removed according to the Code’s procedures. Greenfield, Wis., Code § 4.”

Off. of Lawyer Reg. v. Carl Robert Scholz, 2025 WI 13 (Wis. 2025). · cites it 4× “” ¶56 As to the appropriate sanction for the above misconduct, the referee recommended that the court accept the parties’ stipulation and revoke Attorney Scholz’s license to practice law in Wisconsin based on Section 4.11 of the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Discipline, as…”

Off. of Lawyer Reg. v. Terry L. Constant, 2022 WI 78 (Wis. 2022). “" ¶31 In assessing the severity of the sanction, the referee noted the general rule under ABA Standards § 4.11 that disbarment is appropriate when an attorney knowingly converts client property and causes injury to a client, but stated a "more particularized analysis is…”

Grygiel v. Monches Fish & Game Club, Inc., 2009 WI App 102 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “, Restatement (Third) Property: Servitudes § 4.11 (2000). Indeed, the "classic rule" is that "an easement may only be used to benefit the dominant parcel [and] may not be used to access an adjacent, nondominant parcel.”

Arvo Eilau v. Dennis Roff (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “: SERVITUDES § 4.11 (AM. L. INST. 2000)). ¶27 Like the court in Grygiel, we need not address the added burden issue.”

Show all 13 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.