Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 40.52 (2026)
Health care benefits
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
40.52(1)(1) The group insurance board shall establish by contract a standard health insurance plan in which all insured employees shall participate except as otherwise provided in this chapter. The standard plan shall provide:
40.52(1)(a)(a) A family coverage option for persons desiring to provide for coverage of all eligible dependents and a single coverage option for other eligible persons.
40.52(1)(b)(b) Coverage for expenses incurred by the installation and use of an insulin infusion pump, coverage for all other equipment and supplies used in the treatment of diabetes, including any prescription medication used to treat diabetes, and coverage of diabetic self-management education programs. Coverage required under this paragraph shall be subject to the same exclusions, limitations, deductibles, and coinsurance provisions of the plan as other covered expenses, except that insulin infusion pump coverage may be limited to the purchase of one pump per year and the plan may require the covered person to use a pump for 30 days before purchase.
40.52(2)(2) Health insurance benefits under this subchapter shall be integrated, with exceptions determined appropriate by the group insurance board, with benefits under federal plans for hospital and health care for the aged and disabled. Exclusions and limitations with respect to benefits and different rates may be established for persons eligible under federal plans for hospital and health care for the aged and disabled in recognition of the utilization by persons within the age limits eligible under the federal program. The plan may include special provisions for spouses and other dependents covered under a plan established under this subchapter where one spouse is eligible under federal plans for hospital and health care for the aged but the others are not eligible because of age or other reasons. As part of the integration, the department may, out of premiums collected under s. 40.05 (4), pay premiums for the federal health insurance.
40.52(3)(3) The group insurance board, after consulting with the board of regents of the University of Wisconsin System, shall establish the terms of a health insurance plan for graduate assistants, for teaching assistants, and for employees-in-training designated by the board of regents, who are employed on at least a one-third full-time basis and for teachers who are employed on at least a one-third full-time basis by the University of Wisconsin System with an expected duration of employment of at least 6 months but less than one year. Annually, the administrator of the division of personnel management in the department of administration shall establish the amount that the employer is required to pay in premium costs under this subsection.
40.52(3m)(3m) The group insurance board, after consulting with the board of directors of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority, shall establish the terms of a health insurance plan for graduate assistants, and for employees-in-training designated by the board of directors, who are employed on at least a one-third full-time basis with an expected duration of employment of at least 6 months.
40.52(4)(4) The group insurance board shall establish the terms of health insurance plans for eligible employees, as defined under s. 40.02 (25) (b) 9. and 11., who elect coverage under s. 40.51 (7) or (10).
40.52 HistoryHistory: 1981 c. 96, 381; 1983 a. 429; 1987 a. 107; 1987 a. 327, 356; 1987 a. 403 s. 256; 1989 a. 13; 1991 a. 45; 1995 a. 216; 2001 a. 82; 2009 a. 28; 2011 a. 10; 2015 a. 55; 2017 a. 59.
40.52 AnnotationThe denial of a homosexual employee’s request for family coverage for herself and her companion did not violate equal protection or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of marital status, sexual orientation or gender under s. 111.321. Phillips v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission, 167 Wis. 2d 205, 482 N.W.2d 121 (Ct. App. 1992).
40.52 AnnotationThe insurance subrogation law permitting a subrogated insurer to be reimbursed only if the insured has been made whole applies to the state employee health plan. Leonard v. Dusek, 184 Wis. 2d 267, 516 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App. 1994).
40.52 AnnotationBarring spouses who are both state employees from each electing family medical coverage does not discriminate on the basis of marital status. Kozich v. Employee Trust Funds Board, 203 Wis. 2d 363, 553 N.W.2d 830 (Ct. App. 1996), 95-2219.
40.52 AnnotationBarring spouses who are both public employees from each electing family medical coverage is excepted from the prohibition under ch. 111 against discrimination based on marital status. Motola v. LIRC, 219 Wis. 2d 588, 580 N.W.2d 297 (1998), 97-0896.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1931–2008 · leading case: Motola v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 580 N.W.2d 297 (Wis. 1998).
Motola v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 580 N.W.2d 297 (Wis. 1998). “at 292-93 , citing Wis. Stat. §§ 40.52 (1)(a) and 40.02(20).”
Kozich v. Employe Trust Funds Bd., 553 N.W.2d 830 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “11 In fact, a review of the record suggests the opposite; in light of § 40.52, STATS., requiring a single family plan for married state employees and the plan descriptions in the It's Your *378 Choice booklet, the most reasonable conclusion is that the State did not intend to…”
Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities, 2008 WI 9 (Wis. 2008). “51(3) (providing that health insurance contracts shall establish provisions for employees and dependents to continue group coverage), § 40,52(1)(a) (providing for a "family coverage option" to allow coverage for all eligible dependents), § 40.52(2) (allowing for special…”
Phillips v. Wisconsin Pers. Comm'n, 482 N.W.2d 121 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “Section 40.52(l)(a), Stats. As indicated above, the legislature and DETF have defined "dependent" in terms of the employee's spouse and certain of his or her children.”
Braatz v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 483 N.W.2d 246 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “LIRC points to the fact that under sec. 40.52(1), Stats., a married state employee, whose spouse is also a state employee, cannot elect single coverage health insurance if the spouse is insured under a family coverage plan provided by the state.”
State ex rel. Bd. of Educ. v. City of Racine, 236 N.W. 553 (Wis. 1931). “Sec. 40.52, Stats. 1929. They have general power to supervise and manage the city school system, as specifically defined and set forth in sec.”
Ross v. City of Crandon, 290 N.W. 587 (Wis. 1940). “(1) of sec. 40.52, Stats., by ch. 256, Laws of 1929, Crandon’s failure to comply with that requirement under sec.”
— Wis. Stat. § 40.52(1) — 1 case
Braatz v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 483 N.W.2d 246 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “LIRC points to the fact that under sec. 40.52(1), Stats., a married state employee, whose spouse is also a state employee, cannot elect single coverage health insurance if the spouse is insured under a family coverage plan provided by the state.”
— Wis. Stat. § 40.52(1)(a) — 1 case
Motola v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 580 N.W.2d 297 (Wis. 1998). “at 292-93 , citing Wis. Stat. §§ 40.52 (1)(a) and 40.02(20).”
— Wis. Stat. § 40.52(2) — 1 case
Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities, 2008 WI 9 (Wis. 2008). “51(3) (providing that health insurance contracts shall establish provisions for employees and dependents to continue group coverage), § 40,52(1)(a) (providing for a "family coverage option" to allow coverage for all eligible dependents), § 40.52(2) (allowing for special…”
— Wis. Stat. § 40.52(l)(a) — 4 cases
Kozich v. Employe Trust Funds Bd., 553 N.W.2d 830 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “11 In fact, a review of the record suggests the opposite; in light of § 40.52, STATS., requiring a single family plan for married state employees and the plan descriptions in the It's Your *378 Choice booklet, the most reasonable conclusion is that the State did not intend to…”
Phillips v. Wisconsin Pers. Comm'n, 482 N.W.2d 121 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “Section 40.52(l)(a), Stats. As indicated above, the legislature and DETF have defined "dependent" in terms of the employee's spouse and certain of his or her children.”
Motola v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 580 N.W.2d 297 (Wis. 1998). “at 292-93 , citing Wis. Stat. §§ 40.52 (1)(a) and 40.02(20).”
Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities, 2008 WI 9 (Wis. 2008). “51(3) (providing that health insurance contracts shall establish provisions for employees and dependents to continue group coverage), § 40,52(1)(a) (providing for a "family coverage option" to allow coverage for all eligible dependents), § 40.52(2) (allowing for special…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.