Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 45.12 (2026)
Wisconsin veteran-owned business logotypes
✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
45.12(1)(a)(a) “Disabled veteran-owned business” means a business certified by the department of administration under s. 16.283 (3).
45.12(1)(b)3.3. A business not included under subds. 1. and 2. that the department certifies for purposes of this section as being at least 51 percent owned by one or more veterans.
45.12(2)(2) The department shall design an official logotype appropriate for use by veteran-owned businesses in this state. The logotype design shall contain the words “Wisconsin Veteran-Owned Business.”
45.12(2m)(a)(a) The department shall certify each farmer who applies to the department to use the logotype under par. (b) if the farmer is one of the following:
45.12(2m)(b)(b) The department, in consultation with the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection shall design an official logotype appropriate for use on agricultural products produced by persons certified under par. (a).
45.12(3)(3) The department may design an official logotype, in addition to the one designed under sub. (2), appropriate for use by disabled veteran-owned businesses in this state. The logotype design shall contain the words “Wisconsin Disabled Veteran-Owned Business.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1978–1985 · leading case: Maxey v. Redevelopment Auth. of Racine, 353 N.W.2d 812 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984).
Maxey v. Redevelopment Auth. of Racine, 353 N.W.2d 812 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). “2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction §45.12 (4th ed. 1973). Racine also contends that sec.”
State v. Hungerford, 267 N.W.2d 258 (Wis. 1978). “This is especially true in those situations where the legislature has enacted legislation in an area covered in part by other, previously enacted statutes: *252 “[I]t is assumed that whenever the legislature enacts a provision it had in mind previous statutes relating to the…”
Milwaukee Fed'n of Teachers v. Wisconsin Emp. Relations Comm'n, 266 N.W.2d 314 (Wis. 1978). “See also, 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction §45.12 at 37 (4th ed., Sands, 1973). It has also been stated that an amendment to a statute changes the previous law only so far as it expressly states or necessarily implies change: “[A]s to changing statutory law, there is a…”
State v. Thomas, 381 N.W.2d 567 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “" [citations omitted]; 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 45.12 at 37 (4th ed., Sands, 1973). This is especially true in those situations where the legislature has enacted legislation in an area covered in part by other, previously enacted statutes: "[I]t is assumed that…”
State v. Cramer, 283 N.W.2d 625 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “2d 54 (1977); 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §45.12 at 37 (4th ed., Sands, 1973). *564 This is especially true in those situations where the legislature has enacted legislation in an area covered in part by other, previously enacted statutes: “[I]t is assumed that…”
Opinion No. Oag 30-84, (1984), 73 Op. Att'y Gen. 99 (Wis. Att'y Gen. 1984). “FRANK VOLPINTESTA, Corporation Counsel Kenosha County You request my opinion with respect to three questions which relate to the terms of office of members of a county veterans service commission appointed pursuant to section 45.12, Stats., a single county section 51.”
Wis. Stat. § 45.12(1): 1 case
Opinion No. Oag 30-84, (1984), 73 Op. Att'y Gen. 99 (Wis. Att'y Gen. 1984). “FRANK VOLPINTESTA, Corporation Counsel Kenosha County You request my opinion with respect to three questions which relate to the terms of office of members of a county veterans service commission appointed pursuant to section 45.12, Stats., a single county section 51.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.