Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 48.25 (2026)
Petition: authorization to file
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
48.25(1)(1) A petition initiating proceedings under this chapter shall be signed by a person who has knowledge of the facts alleged or is informed of them and believes them to be true. The district attorney, corporation counsel or other appropriate official specified under s. 48.09 may file the petition if the proceeding is under s. 48.13 or 48.133. The counsel or guardian ad litem for a parent, relative, guardian or child may file a petition under s. 48.13 or 48.14. The counsel or guardian ad litem for an expectant mother or the guardian ad litem for an unborn child may file a petition under s. 48.133. The district attorney, corporation counsel or other appropriate person designated by the court may initiate proceedings under s. 48.14 in a manner specified by the court.
48.25(2)(2) If the proceeding is brought under s. 48.13 or 48.133, the district attorney, corporation counsel, or other appropriate official shall file the petition, close the case, or refer the case back to intake within 20 days after the date that the intake worker’s request was filed. A referral back to intake may be made only when the district attorney, corporation counsel, or other appropriate official decides not to file a petition or determines that further investigation is necessary. If the case is referred back to intake upon a decision not to file a petition, the intake worker shall close the case or enter into an informal disposition within 20 days after the date of the referral. If the case is referred back to intake for further investigation, the appropriate agency or person shall complete the investigation within 20 days after the date of the referral. If another referral is made to the district attorney, corporation counsel, or other appropriate official, it shall be considered a new referral to which the time periods of this subsection apply. The time periods in this subsection may only be extended by a court upon a showing of good cause under s. 48.315. If a petition is not filed within the applicable time period set forth in this subsection and the court has not granted an extension, the petition shall be accompanied by a statement of reasons for the delay. The court shall grant appropriate relief as provided in s. 48.315 (3) with respect to any petition that is not filed within the applicable time period specified in this subsection. Failure to object to the fact that a petition is not filed within the applicable time period specified in this subsection waives any challenge to the court’s competency to act on the petition.
48.25(3)(3) If the district attorney, corporation counsel or other appropriate official specified in s. 48.09 refuses to file a petition, any person may request the judge to order that the petition be filed and a hearing shall be held on the request. The judge may order the filing of the petition on his or her own motion. The matter may not be heard by the judge who orders the filing of a petition.
48.25(6)(6) If a proceeding is brought under s. 48.13, any party to or any governmental or social agency involved in the proceeding may petition the court to issue a temporary restraining order and injunction as provided in s. 813.122 or 813.125. The court exercising jurisdiction under this chapter shall follow the procedure under s. 813.122 or 813.125 except that the court may combine hearings authorized under s. 813.122 or 813.125 and this chapter, the petitioner for the temporary restraining order and injunction is not subject to the limitations under s. 813.122 (2) (a) or 813.125 (2) and no fee is required regarding the filing of the petition under s. 813.122 or 813.125.
48.25 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 354, 447; 1979 c. 300, 331, 355, 359; 1985 a. 234; 1993 a. 318; 1995 a. 77; 1997 a. 292; 2007 a. 199; 2013 a. 321.
48.25 Annotation“Good cause” under sub. (2) is determined by first considering the best interests of the child. Additional factors are whether: 1) the party seeking the enlargement of time has acted in good faith; 2) the opposing party is not prejudiced; and 3) the dilatory party took prompt action to remedy the situation. F.E.W. v. State, 143 Wis. 2d 856, 422 N.W.2d 893 (Ct. App. 1988).
48.25 AnnotationIn a case referred by the district attorney of one county to another county, each district attorney had 20 days under sub. (2) to act following the respective referrals by the intake workers of each county. State v. Everett, 231 Wis. 2d 616, 605 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1999), 98-3444.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: In Interest of Shawn BN, 497 N.W.2d 141 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
In Interest of Shawn BN, 497 N.W.2d 141 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “Section 48.25(2)(a), Stats. The juvenile court must "dismiss with prejudice a petition which was not timely filed unless the court finds at the plea hearing that good cause has been shown for failure to meet the time limitations.”
In Interest of Few v. State, 422 N.W.2d 893 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “We conclude that the state showed the requisite "good cause” to permit *858 the late filing of a petition for determination of status under sec. 48.25(2)(a), Stats. Therefore, we affirm the trial court.”
State v. Jones, 532 N.W.2d 79 (Wis. 1995). “Jones argues that even if a juvenile's right to counsel does not attach until the sec.”
In Interest of Michael JL, 496 N.W.2d 758 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “, is not one of these specified petitions that can be filed by designated individuals to initiate proceedings.”
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971). “§ 49-5-6 (1966); Wis. Stat. Ann. § 48.25 (2) (Supp. 1971): Wyo Stat.”
C.A.K. v. State, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “The drafting records further indicate that the statutory time limitation was added to sec. 48.25 because "the intake process [tended] to bog down when it [got] to the district attorney .”
State v. Woods, 345 N.W.2d 457 (Wis. 1984). “We hold that Woods did not become the subject of a "criminal prosecution" within the meaning of the sixth amendment until a formal petition was filed under sec. 48.25, Stats., which alleged him to be delinquent.”
State v. Everett, 605 N.W.2d 633 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “First, he contends that the delinquency petition was subject to mandatory dismissal with prejudice pursuant to § 48.25(2)(a), Stats., 1 and C.A.K. v. State, 154 Wis.”
In Interest of Jason B., 500 N.W.2d 384 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “defines the sole issue on appeal as whether dismissal of a petition without prejudice after noncompliance with a mandatory time limit constitutes good cause for refiling the same petition beyond the mandatory time limits of sec. 48.25(2)(a), Stats. We conclude that good cause…”
San Francisco Human Servs. Agency v. Felicia C., 199 Cal. App. 4th 784 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011). “Code § 49-6-1; Wis. Stat. § 48.25 .) Our conclusion is consistent with the out-of-state decisions that have considered separation of powers challenges to such statutes.”
State in Interest of Dino, 359 So. 2d 586 (La. 1978). “§ 49-5-6 ; Wis.Stat.Ann. § 48.25(2); Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 14-115.”
State v. Trent N., 569 N.W.2d 719 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “The district attorney may then file a petition under § 48.25(1), Stats. In addition, the juvenile judge *742 may act as an intake worker, see § 48.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.25(1) — 8 cases
State v. Trent N., 569 N.W.2d 719 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “The district attorney may then file a petition under § 48.25(1), Stats. In addition, the juvenile judge *742 may act as an intake worker, see § 48.”
In Interest of Michael JL, 496 N.W.2d 758 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “, is not one of these specified petitions that can be filed by designated individuals to initiate proceedings.”
State Ex Rel. E.R. v. Flynn, 276 N.W.2d 313 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979).
In Interest of Antonio MC, 513 N.W.2d 662 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
In Interest of Jermaine Tj, 510 N.W.2d 735 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
— Wis. Stat. § 48.25(2) — 3 cases
State in Interest of Dino, 359 So. 2d 586 (La. 1978). “§ 49-5-6 ; Wis.Stat.Ann. § 48.25(2); Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 14-115.”
C.A.K. v. State, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “The drafting records further indicate that the statutory time limitation was added to sec. 48.25 because "the intake process [tended] to bog down when it [got] to the district attorney .”
In Interest of Michael JL, 496 N.W.2d 758 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “, is not one of these specified petitions that can be filed by designated individuals to initiate proceedings.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.25(2)(a) — 16 cases
In Interest of Shawn BN, 497 N.W.2d 141 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “Section 48.25(2)(a), Stats. The juvenile court must "dismiss with prejudice a petition which was not timely filed unless the court finds at the plea hearing that good cause has been shown for failure to meet the time limitations.”
In Interest of Few v. State, 422 N.W.2d 893 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “We conclude that the state showed the requisite "good cause” to permit *858 the late filing of a petition for determination of status under sec. 48.25(2)(a), Stats. Therefore, we affirm the trial court.”
State v. Everett, 605 N.W.2d 633 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “First, he contends that the delinquency petition was subject to mandatory dismissal with prejudice pursuant to § 48.25(2)(a), Stats., 1 and C.A.K. v. State, 154 Wis.”
In Interest of Michael JL, 496 N.W.2d 758 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “, is not one of these specified petitions that can be filed by designated individuals to initiate proceedings.”
C.A.K. v. State, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “The drafting records further indicate that the statutory time limitation was added to sec. 48.25 because "the intake process [tended] to bog down when it [got] to the district attorney .”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.25(3) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Kenneth S. v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2008 WI App 120 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008).
— Wis. Stat. § 48.25(6) — 1 case
Cnty. of Door v. Hayes-Brook, 449 N.W.2d 601 (Wis. 1990).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.