Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 757 — GENERAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING COURTS OF RECORD,
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 757.91 (2026)

Supreme court; disposition

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
757.91757.91 Supreme court; disposition. The supreme court shall review the findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations under s. 757.89 and determine appropriate discipline in cases of misconduct and appropriate action in cases of permanent disability. The rules of the supreme court applicable to civil cases in the supreme court govern the review proceedings under this section.
757.91 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 449; 1983 a. 378 s. 11m.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 3× “§ 757.91 . By assigning exclusive responsibility for judicial discipline to this court, the Wisconsin Constitution precludes the legislative and executive branches from compromising independent adjudication in Wisconsin courts.”
In the Matter of Jud. Discip. Proceed. Against Tesmer, 580 N.W.2d 307 (Wis. 1998). · cites it 8× “This is a review, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 757.91 , [1] of the findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation for discipline of the judicial conduct panel concerning the conduct of the Honorable Louise M.”
In the Matter of Jud. Discip. Proceedings Against Crawford, 2001 WI 96 (Wis. 2001). · cites it 6× “1 We review, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 757.91 (1999-2000), the judicial conduct panel's findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation for discipline.”
In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ziegler, 2008 WI 47 (Wis. 2008). · cites it 4× “" [16] Section 757.91 provides: Supreme court; disposition.”
Wis. Jud. Comm'n v. Piontek (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Piontek), 927 N.W.2d 552 (Wis. 2019). · cites it 3× “We conclude that a five-day suspension is the appropriate discipline for Judge Piontek's judicial misconduct.”
In Matter of Complaint Against Seraphim, 294 N.W.2d 485 (Wis. 1980). · cites it 2× “*490 Under sec. 757.91, Stats., our task is to review the findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations made by the panel and to determine what discipline, if any, is appropriate.”
In Re the Complaint Against Judge Grady, 348 N.W.2d 559 (Wis. 1984). · cites it 2× “We review, pursuant to sec. 757.91, Stats., the findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation of the judicial conduct panel in the judicial disciplinary proceeding brought by the Judicial Commission against the Honorable Warren A.”
Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Laatsch, 2007 WI 20 (Wis. 2007). · cites it 3× “We review, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 757.91 (2003-04) 1 a judicial conduct panel's *146 findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation for discipline for the Honorable Daryl Laatsch, a former municipal judge for the Mid-Moraine Municipal Court.”
WJC v. Hon. Scott C. Woldt, 2021 WI 73 (Wis. 2021). · cites it 7× “" Wis. Stat. § 757.91 (emphasis added). A recommendation is not a judicial act that carries any legal effect.”
Wisconsin Jud. Comm'n v. Gableman, 2010 WI 62 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 6× “In Mitchell's appeal, Justice Butler successfully argued that the rape-shield law, a law designed to protect sexual assault victims, had been violated, an argument that inured to Mitchell's benefit. 21. The statement in the advertisement, "Mitchell went on to molest another…”
Wisconsin Jud. Comm'n v. Gableman, 2010 WI 61 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 2× “5 Justice Gableman moved this court for review of the panel's recommendation that summary judgment be granted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 757.91 . The Judicial Commission agreed that the factual record was complete and could form the basis for this court's review.”
In the Matter of Jud. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Michelson, 591 N.W.2d 843 (Wis. 1999). · cites it 4× “This is a review pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 757.91 1 of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation for discipline of the judicial conduct panel concerning the judicial misconduct of the Hon.”
Show all 33 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.